Theorem 11.1.5.2B3316345A4A For every smooth real function $u$,
EB2FF7F930E4
11.1.6
CA97FF13B1BBFor a smooth real function $u$ on $X$, write $\omega _ u=\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u$, and set
The set $\mathcal H_\omega $ of smooth strictly $\omega $-plurisubharmonic functions is convex and open in the $C^2$ topology, while the mass $\mathrm M_\omega (u)$ is defined for every smooth real $u$. Expanding it along a smooth direction gives a polynomial whose nonconstant coefficients detect the complex Hessians of the powers of the background.
Theorem 11.1.5.2B3316345A4A For every smooth real function $u$,
EB2FF7F930E4
11.1.6
Proof. Expand $(\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u)^ n$ by the binomial theorem. The term with $k=n$ integrates to zero, since it is exact:
For $1\leq k\leq n-1$, apply lemma 11.1.2 with $f=u$ and $T=(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u)^{k-1}\wedge \omega ^{n-k}$. Since both $\mathrm{d}$ and $\mathrm d^{\mathrm c}$ annihilate $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u$,
which gives the $k$th term of (11.1.6). When $n=1$, the sum is empty and the mass is constant. $\square$
If every $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(\omega ^ j)$ with $1\leq j\leq n-1$ vanishes, (11.1.6) shows that the mass is constant. Conversely, varying the potential in several independent directions recovers each of these forms by polarization.
Theorem 11.1.7 (Chiose).FB90FC741F25 Assume $n\geq 2$. The following conditions are equivalent:
$\int _ X(\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u)^ n$ is independent of $u\in \mathcal H_\omega $;
$\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(\omega ^ j)=0$ for $1\leq j\leq n-1$;
$\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\omega =0$ and $\mathrm{d}\omega \wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}\omega =0$.
They are also equivalent to the condition that $\int _ X(\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u)^ n$ be the same for all bounded $\omega $-plurisubharmonic functions $u$, where $(\omega +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u)^ n$ is the Bedford–Taylor product of section 5.28. Under these conditions the common mass is $\int _ X\omega ^ n$.
Proof. Step 1: the first condition implies the second. Let $u$ be a smooth real function. For $|t|$ small, $tu$ belongs to $\mathcal H_\omega $ for both signs of $t$, so the polynomial $t\mapsto \int _ X(\omega +t\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u)^ n$ is constant on an interval and its nonconstant coefficients vanish. For $1\leq j\leq n-1$ this gives
Replace $u$ by a linear combination of $n-j$ smooth real functions $u_1,\ldots ,u_{n-j}$ and compare the coefficients of the monomial in which every parameter appears once. We obtain
Integrating by parts in the first factor and using that $u_1$ is arbitrary, we obtain the pointwise identity
for every choice of the remaining functions. At a given point, the complex Hessians of these functions can be prescribed arbitrarily: multiply a quadratic polynomial in a coordinate chart by a cutoff function equal to one near that point. Since the identity is multilinear, we may complexify it and use the quadratic monomials $z_ a\bar z_ b$. Wedge products of their complex Hessians give all coordinate forms of the complementary bidegree, and pairing with these forms shows that every coefficient of $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(\omega ^ j)$ vanishes. When $j=n-1$ there are no remaining factors, and the same conclusion follows directly from the arbitrariness of $u_1$. This proves the second condition.
Step 2: the remaining equivalences for smooth potentials. The second condition implies the first by theorem 11.1.5. For $n\geq 3$, the identities for $j=1,2$ and lemma 11.1.3 give $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\omega =0$ and
so the second condition implies the third. For $n=2$, the second condition is $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\omega =0$, while $\mathrm{d}\omega \wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}\omega $ vanishes for degree reasons; the implication is again immediate. Conversely, lemma 11.1.3 derives all the identities of the second condition from the third.
Step 3: bounded potentials. Assume the first condition and let $u$ be a bounded $\omega $-plurisubharmonic function. By theorem 5.32.1, there are uniformly bounded functions $u_ j\in \mathcal H_\omega $ decreasing to $u$. Their masses all equal $\int _ X\omega ^ n$, and the continuity of the bounded products of section 5.28 along such sequences passes this common value to the limit. Conversely, every element of $\mathcal H_\omega $ is a bounded $\omega $-plurisubharmonic function, so constancy for bounded potentials implies the first condition. The zero potential shows that the common mass is $\int _ X\omega ^ n$. $\square$
In particular, a closed background has invariant mass. Under the equivalent conditions above, (11.1.6) even gives $\mathrm M_\omega (u)=\int _ X\omega ^ n$ for every smooth real $u$, not only for $u\in \mathcal H_\omega $. In dimension one the mass is always $\int _ X\omega $.
Mass invariance can also hold in a nonclosed background. In theorem 12.18.15, a pluriclosed metric with nonzero exterior derivative satisfies all the lower-power identities above. Those identities fix its bounded-potential mass, even though a family of scalar perturbations can have its least relative eigenvalue tend to zero.
The first variation of the mass involves only the complex Hessian of the power $\omega _ u^{n-1}$ of the perturbed form.
Proposition 11.1.8.5C29873687ED For smooth real functions $u,v$ on $X$,
0B024E0A2A47
11.1.9
If $\mathrm M_\omega $ is constant on $\mathcal H_\omega $, then $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(\omega _ u^{n-1})=0$ for every $u\in \mathcal H_\omega $.
Proof. Since $\mathrm M_\omega (u+tv)$ is a polynomial in $t$, its derivative at $t=0$ is
and lemma 11.1.2 turns this into the right-hand side of (11.1.9). For the second assertion, fix $u\in \mathcal H_\omega $. For every smooth real direction $v$, the segment $u+tv$ lies in $\mathcal H_\omega $ when $|t|$ is sufficiently small, so the right-hand side of (11.1.9) vanishes for all smooth real $v$. Hence the smooth top-degree form $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(\omega _ u^{n-1})$ vanishes. $\square$
Corollary 11.1.10.2C05FFD39C6D If $n=2$, then for every smooth real function $u$ on $X$,
Consequently, $\mathrm M_\omega $ is constant on $\mathcal H_\omega $ if and only if $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\omega =0$.
Proof. The formula is the case $n=2$ of (11.1.6), and it shows that $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\omega =0$ implies constancy. Conversely, if the mass is constant, proposition 11.1.8 at $u=0$ gives $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\omega =0$. $\square$
The identity $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(\omega ^{n-1})=0$ makes the first variation vanish at $u=0$; Hermitian forms satisfying it are the Gauduchon metrics of section 11.3. On a surface this identity already gives mass invariance. In dimension three, however, (11.1.6) reads
Vanishing of $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(\omega ^2)$ removes the linear term, while $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\omega $ still governs the quadratic term. Thus stationarity of the mass at one potential must be distinguished from its invariance on $\mathcal H_\omega $; an explicit example is given in example 11.23.5.
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.