Pome

11.1.11 Mass variation on a complex torusD4D9C4F87D5D

By corollary 11.1.10, the mass on a surface varies precisely through the pairing $2\int _ Xu\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\omega $ of the potential with the complex Hessian of the background. A product of elliptic curves gives an explicit background and a family of smooth potentials for which this pairing is nonzero.

Example 11.1.12.F336FEED9D87 Let $X=(\mathbb C/(\mathbb Z+\mathrm i\mathbb Z))^2$. For $j=1,2$, let $z_ j=x_ j+\mathrm i y_ j$ be the standard coordinates on the universal cover $\mathbb C^2$, with $x_ j,y_ j$ real, and put

\[ \beta _ j=\frac{\mathrm i}{2\pi }\, \mathrm{d}z_ j\wedge \mathrm{d}\bar z_ j. \]

The forms $\beta _ j$ descend to $X$. For a real parameter $t$, define

\[ b(x_1)=2+\cos (2\pi x_1),\qquad \omega =\beta _1+b(x_1)\beta _2,\qquad u_ t=t\cos (2\pi x_1). \]

Since $1\leq b\leq 3$, the form $\omega $ is Hermitian. It is not closed, because $\mathrm{d}\omega =\mathrm{d}b\wedge \beta _2$ is not identically zero.

For a function $f$ of $x_1$ alone, one has $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}f=(f''/4)\beta _1$, where the prime denotes differentiation in $x_1$. Hence

\[ \omega _{u_ t} =\bigl (1-\pi ^2t\cos (2\pi x_1)\bigr )\beta _1+b\beta _2>0 \quad \text{if}\quad |t|<\pi ^{-2}. \]

Writing $B=\int _ X\beta _1\wedge \beta _2>0$, we have

914CB776FFB8 11.1.13
\begin{equation} \mathrm M_\omega (u_ t)=(4-\pi ^2t)B. \end{equation}

Indeed,

\[ \omega _{u_ t}^2 =2\bigl (1-\pi ^2t\cos (2\pi x_1)\bigr ) \bigl (2+\cos (2\pi x_1)\bigr )\beta _1\wedge \beta _2, \]

and over a period the average of $\cos (2\pi x_1)$ is zero while that of its square is $1/2$.

Although the complex torus is Kähler, the background $\omega $ chosen above is not closed, and this already allows the mass to vary. On non-Kähler manifolds even an upper bound for the mass can fail; the Hopf manifolds of section 23.1 give examples.

Corollary 11.1.14.0C9AAEBBC04C In general, the total Monge–Ampère mass is not determined by the ordinary singularity type or by the multiplier ideals, even among smooth strictly $\omega $-plurisubharmonic potentials.

Proof. The potentials $u_ t$ of example 11.1.12 are smooth on the compact manifold $X$, so any two of them differ by a bounded function and have the same singularity type in the sense of section 5.33. For the same reason, their multiplier ideals are the structure sheaf for every positive multiple of the weight. By (11.1.13), their masses differ. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.