Definition 5.47.2.5458CA6608A5 Let $X$ be a complex manifold. A subset $E\subset X$ is pluripolar, or locally pluripolar, if every point of $X$ has a connected coordinate neighborhood $U$ carrying a function $V\in \mathrm{PSH}(U)$ with $E\cap U\subset \{ V=-\infty \} $. If $X$ is connected, a subset $E\subset X$ is globally pluripolar in $X$ if there is a single $V\in \mathrm{PSH}(X)$ with $E\subset \{ V=-\infty \} $. A property holds quasi-everywhere if it holds outside a pluripolar set.
5.47 Pluripolar sets and the plurifine topologyF5A3147592B6
F5A3147592B6
The upper semicontinuous regularization of the supremum of a family of plurisubharmonic functions is plurisubharmonic, but it may differ from the supremum on an exceptional set (in dimension one, see example 3.4.24 with $d=2$). In section 7.1 we showed that, locally, this exceptional set has outer Monge–Ampère capacity zero (corollary 7.6.2), and that the same holds for the pole set of every plurisubharmonic function (proposition 7.4.4). The first aim of this chapter is the converse: every subset of a ball with outer capacity zero lies in the pole set of a single plurisubharmonic function on the ball. Sets that are locally contained in pole sets are called pluripolar; they play in pluripotential theory the role that polar sets play in the classical theory of section 3.4, section 4.1, section 4.2.
The link between capacity and pole sets is the relative extremal function $H_ E$ of a set $E$ in a ball $B$, the regularized upper envelope of the plurisubharmonic functions on $B$ that are nonpositive and at most $-1$ on $E$. For compact sets and for relatively compact open sets, the capacity of $E$ is the total Monge–Ampère mass of $H_ E$ (proposition 5.47.6, proposition 5.47.7). If $E$ has outer capacity zero, the extremal functions of small open neighborhoods of $E$ therefore have small mass, and the comparison principle shows that $H_ E=0$; a convergent series of functions from the envelope then has poles on all of $E$ (theorem 5.47.8). It follows that countable unions of pluripolar sets are pluripolar and that the exceptional sets of upper envelopes are pluripolar (corollary 5.47.11). On $\mathbb C^ n$ the local functions can even be glued, with the help of small multiples of $\log ^+|z|$, into a single plurisubharmonic function on the whole space; this is Josefson's theorem (theorem 5.47.10).
The second half of the chapter studies the plurifine topology, the analogue of the fine topology of section 4.2 defined by plurisubharmonic functions. Unbounded potentials force us to use it: the set $\{ u>-k\} $, on which a plurisubharmonic function $u$ coincides with its truncation $\max \{ u,-k\} $, is plurifine open but in general not open. We prove that Bedford–Taylor products of locally bounded potentials are local for the plurifine topology (theorem 5.47.22), by combining their locality on sets of the form $\{ u>v\} $ (proposition 7.3.10) with a quasi-Lindelöf theorem: every union of plurifine open sets coincides with a countable subunion outside a pluripolar set (theorem 5.47.20).
Consequently, for plurisubharmonic functions $u_1,\ldots ,u_ q$, the products of the truncations $\max \{ u_ l,-k\} $ do not depend on $k\ge m$ on the set $\bigcap _ l\{ u_ l>-m\} $ (proposition 5.47.23); this compatibility is the starting point of the non-pluripolar products of section 13.1. Finally, the difference of two plurisubharmonic functions is plurifinely continuous off their common pole set. Its quasi-supremum and quasi-infimum on a plurifine open set, which disregard pluripolar sets, are therefore its ordinary supremum and infimum off any pluripolar set containing the common poles (corollary 5.47.27).
Historical remarks and references for this chapter are collected in subsection 25.1.10.
5.47.1 Pluripolar sets and relative extremal functions27FCEC6F336F
We define pluripolar sets on complex manifolds and then introduce, on a ball, the relative extremal functions that connect them with the Monge–Ampère capacity of section 7.4.
Pluripolar sets are not required to be Borel, and subsets of pluripolar sets are pluripolar. If $E\subset X$ is pluripolar and $W\subset X$ is open, then $E\cap W$ is pluripolar in $W$: restrict the functions of the definition to small coordinate balls in $W$. Every pluripolar set $E$ has Lebesgue measure zero in every chart. Indeed, a chart domain $C$ has a countable basis, so it is covered by countably many of the sets $U\cap C$, with $U$ as in the definition, and each set $E\cap U\cap C$ lies in the pole set of the corresponding function $V$. In the coordinates of the chart, $V$ is plurisubharmonic on each connected component of $U\cap C$, hence locally integrable there (theorem 5.9.1), so its pole set in $U\cap C$ is Lebesgue null. In dimension zero every plurisubharmonic function is finite, so the only pluripolar set is the empty set. From now on the complex dimension $n$ is positive.
Let $\Omega \subset \mathbb C^ n$ be open. By theorem 5.9.1, the plurisubharmonic functions in definition 5.47.2 are nontrivial subharmonic functions when $\mathbb C^ n$ is identified with $\mathbb R^{2n}$, so every pluripolar subset of $\Omega $ is real polar in the sense of section 5.10. For $n\ge 2$ the converse fails: example 5.47.12 exhibits a real polar subset of $\mathbb C^ n$ that is not pluripolar. For $n=1$ the converse holds, so that the pluripolar subsets of $\Omega $ are exactly its polar subsets in the sense of definition 3.4.26. Indeed, let $A\subset \Omega $ be polar, and let $D$ be a disc with $\overline D\subset \Omega $. By proposition 4.1.11, applied to $A\cap D$, there is a fundamental potential on $\mathbb C$ equal to $-\infty $ on $A\cap D$; it is a nontrivial subharmonic function by proposition 3.4.11, hence plurisubharmonic on $D$. Since every point of $\Omega $, whether in $A$ or not, lies in such a disc, $A$ is pluripolar.
This changes the meaning of quasi-everywhere. In definition 4.2.10 it meant outside a polar set of $\mathbb R^ d$; from now on, throughout 2, it means outside a pluripolar set, as in definition 5.47.2. Since pluripolar sets are real polar, a property that holds quasi-everywhere on $\Omega $ in the new sense also holds outside a real polar set; for $n=1$ the two notions agree, whereas for $n\ge 2$ the new notion is strictly stronger.
For the rest of this section, $B$ denotes an open ball in $\mathbb C^ n$. Recall the capacity $\operatorname {Cap}_ B$ and the outer capacity $\operatorname {Cap}_ B^*$ of definition 7.4.2; the competitors for $\operatorname {Cap}_ B$ are the functions $v\in \mathrm{PSH}(B)$ with $0\le v\le 1$. For a set $E\subset B$ we define
The functions $v$ in this supremum are called competitors for $E$; we always name the set, to distinguish them from the competitors for $\operatorname {Cap}_ B$. The constant $-1$ is a competitor for $E$, and so is the maximum of a competitor for $E$ with $-1$; hence we may restrict the supremum to competitors with values in $[-1,0]$, and $-1\le h_ E\le H_ E\le 0$. Since every competitor for $E$ is at most $-1$ on $E$, we also have $h_ E=-1$ on $E$. If $v$ is a competitor for $E$ with values in $[-1,0]$, then $v+1$ is a competitor for $\operatorname {Cap}_ B$. By theorem 5.10.2, $H_ E$ is plurisubharmonic; we call it the relative extremal function of $E$ with respect to $B$. It is the plurisubharmonic counterpart of the relative extremal function $u_ A$ of subsection 4.1.13, which is defined by the same constraints on subharmonic functions.
We shall use the following properties of these functions repeatedly. If $E\subset F\subset B$, then every competitor for $F$ is a competitor for $E$, so $h_ F\le h_ E$ and $H_ F\le H_ E$. If $B=B(a,R)$ and $\overline E$ is a compact subset of $B$, then for a sufficiently large constant $A>0$ the function $A(|z-a|^2-R^2)$ is at most $-1$ on $E$, hence it is a competitor for $E$, and
BD894E43C430
5.47.3
in particular $H_ E(z)\to 0$ as $z\to \partial B$.
Next, Choquet's lemma (lemma 3.4.22) gives competitors $w_1,w_2,\ldots $ for $E$ with $(\sup _ kw_ k)^*=H_ E$. The finite maxima $v_ j=\max \{ -1,w_1,\ldots ,w_ j\} $ are competitors for $E$, and their limit $g=\lim _ jv_ j$ satisfies $\sup _ kw_ k\le g\le h_ E$; taking regularizations, we get $g^*=H_ E$. By theorem 5.10.2, applied to the family $(v_ j)$, we have $g=g^*$ almost everywhere. Thus there are competitors $v_ j$ for $E$ with
CA38D8657CFB
5.47.4
Finally, by corollary 7.6.2, for every compact set $L\subset B$ the set $L\cap \{ h_ E<H_ E\} $ has outer capacity zero in $B$. Exhausting $B$ by countably many compact sets and using the countable subadditivity of outer capacity (proposition 7.4.3), we obtain
A set $N\subset B$ with $\operatorname {Cap}_ B^*(N)=0$ has outer measure zero for $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v)^ n$ whenever $v$ is a competitor for $\operatorname {Cap}_ B$, since $\int _ G(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v)^ n\le \operatorname {Cap}_ B(G)$ for every open set $G\supset N$.
Proposition 5.47.6.5292FEC65E83 Let $B\subset \mathbb C^ n$ be an open ball, and let $K\subset B$ be compact. Then $H_ K(z)\to 0$ as $z\to \partial B$, the Monge–Ampère measure $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_ K)^ n$ is carried by $K\cap \{ H_ K=-1\} $, and
If $(K_ j)$ is a decreasing sequence of compact subsets of $B$ with intersection $K$, then the functions $H_{K_ j}$ increase and converge to $H_ K$ almost everywhere, and $\operatorname {Cap}_ B(K_ j)$ decreases to $\operatorname {Cap}_ B(K)$. In particular $\operatorname {Cap}_ B^*(K)=\operatorname {Cap}_ B(K)$.
Proof. The boundary behavior of $H_ K$ follows from (5.47.3). Since $H_ K$ is bounded, its Monge–Ampère measure is defined (definition 7.2.1).
We first show that $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_ K)^ n$ vanishes on $B\setminus K$. Choose competitors $v_ j$ for $K$ as in (5.47.4), and let $D$ be a ball with $\overline D\subset B\setminus K$. Let $\widehat v_ j$ be the function obtained from $v_ j$ by corollary 7.7.5: it is plurisubharmonic on $B$, equals $v_ j$ outside $D$, and satisfies $\widehat v_ j\ge v_ j$ and $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\widehat v_ j)^ n=0$ on $D$. Each $\widehat v_ j$ is again a competitor for $K$. Indeed, $\widehat v_ j=v_ j\le -1$ on $K$. Moreover $\widehat v_ j\le 0$: outside $D$ because $\widehat v_ j=v_ j$, and on $D$ by the maximum principle (proposition 3.4.7), since by upper semicontinuity the upper limit of $\widehat v_ j$ at each point $x\in \partial D$ is at most $\widehat v_ j(x)=v_ j(x)\le 0$.
Since $\widehat v_ j$ is increasing in $v_ j$ by corollary 7.7.5, the functions $\widehat v_ j$ increase with $j$, and $v_ j\le \widehat v_ j\le h_ K\le H_ K$ shows that $\widehat v_ j\to H_ K$ almost everywhere. They take values in $[-1,0]$, so theorem 7.6.1 gives $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\widehat v_ j)^ n\to (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_ K)^ n$ weakly, and therefore $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_ K)^ n=0$ on $D$. Covering the open set $B\setminus K$ by countably many such balls $D$, we conclude that $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_ K)^ n$ is carried by $K$.
As $h_ K=-1$ on $K$, the Borel set $K\cap \{ H_ K>-1\} $ is contained in $\{ h_ K<H_ K\} $, which has outer capacity zero by (5.47.5). Because $H_ K+1$ is a competitor for $\operatorname {Cap}_ B$, this set is therefore null for $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(H_ K+1))^ n=(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_ K)^ n$. Thus $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_ K)^ n$ is carried by $K\cap \{ H_ K=-1\} $.
We now prove the capacity formula. As $H_ K+1$ is a competitor for $\operatorname {Cap}_ B$ and $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_ K)^ n$ is carried by $K$, we have $\int _ B(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_ K)^ n=\int _ K(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(H_ K+1))^ n\le \operatorname {Cap}_ B(K)$. Conversely, let $v$ be a competitor for $\operatorname {Cap}_ B$, let $0<\varepsilon <1/2$, and put $w=(1-2\varepsilon )(v-1)-\varepsilon $. Then $-1+\varepsilon \le w\le -\varepsilon $. In particular $w>-1$, so $K\cap \{ H_ K\ge w\} \subset K\cap \{ H_ K>-1\} $; this set has outer capacity zero and is therefore null for $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w)^ n=(1-2\varepsilon )^ n(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v)^ n$. Moreover $H_ K(z)\to 0$ as $z\to \partial B$ while $w\le -\varepsilon $, so $\varliminf _{z\to x}(H_ K(z)-w(z))\ge \varepsilon >0$ for every $x\in \partial B$, and the comparison principle (theorem 7.3.11) applies to $H_ K$ and $w$ on $B$. We obtain
Letting $\varepsilon \downarrow 0$ and taking the supremum over $v$, we get $\operatorname {Cap}_ B(K)\le \int _ B(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_ K)^ n$.
Now let $(K_ j)$ be compact subsets of $B$ decreasing to $K$. Since $K\subset K_{j+1}\subset K_ j$, the functions $H_{K_ j}$ increase and are bounded above by $H_ K$. Put $H=(\sup _ jH_{K_ j})^*$. By theorem 5.10.2, $H$ is plurisubharmonic and equals $\sup _ jH_{K_ j}$ almost everywhere, and $H\le H_ K$ because $H_ K$ is upper semicontinuous. For the reverse inequality, let $v$ be a competitor for $K$ and let $0<\varepsilon <1$. The open set $G=\{ v<-1+\varepsilon \} $ contains $K$. The compact sets $K_ j\setminus G$ decrease and have empty intersection, so one of them is empty; hence $K_ j\subset G$ for all large $j$. For such $j$ the function $v/(1-\varepsilon )$ is a competitor for $K_ j$, and hence $v\le (1-\varepsilon )H_{K_ j}\le (1-\varepsilon )H$. Letting $\varepsilon \downarrow 0$ gives $v\le H$, and taking the supremum over all competitors $v$ for $K$ gives $h_ K\le H$. As $H$ is upper semicontinuous, $H_ K\le H$. Therefore $H=H_ K$, and $H_{K_ j}\to H_ K$ almost everywhere.
By theorem 7.6.1, $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_{K_ j})^ n\to (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_ K)^ n$ weakly. All these measures are carried by the fixed compact set $K_1$, so testing with a function in $C_ c(B)$ equal to one on $K_1$ shows that their total masses converge. By the capacity formula, $\operatorname {Cap}_ B(K_ j)\to \operatorname {Cap}_ B(K)$, and this convergence is decreasing because capacity is increasing.
Finally, $\operatorname {Cap}_ B(K)\le \operatorname {Cap}_ B^*(K)$ because capacity is increasing. For the converse we may assume $K\neq \varnothing $, since both capacities of the empty set vanish. Choose $\delta >0$ such that the compact sets $K_ j=\{ z:\operatorname {dist}(z,K)\le \delta /j\} $ lie in $B$. They decrease to $K$, and each contains $K$ in its interior. Hence $\operatorname {Cap}_ B^*(K)\le \operatorname {Cap}_ B(\operatorname{Int}K_ j)\le \operatorname {Cap}_ B(K_ j)$, and the right-hand side tends to $\operatorname {Cap}_ B(K)$ by what we have just proved. $\square$
Proposition 5.47.7.1D1F65765AD9 Let $B\subset \mathbb C^ n$ be an open ball, and let $G$ be an open set with $G\Subset B$. Then $h_ G=H_ G$, $H_ G=-1$ on $G$, $H_ G(z)\to 0$ as $z\to \partial B$, the measure $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_ G)^ n$ is carried by $\overline G$, and
Proof. Choose compact sets $K_ j$ with $K_ j\subset \operatorname{Int}K_{j+1}$ and $\bigcup _ jK_ j=G$. Since the $K_ j$ increase, the functions $H_{K_ j}$ decrease. They take values in $[-1,0]$, so their limit $H$ is plurisubharmonic by theorem 5.10.1. Since $h_{K_ j}=-1$ on $K_ j$ and the upper regularization at a point only involves the values of $h_{K_ j}$ near that point, we have $H_{K_ j}=-1$ on $\operatorname{Int}K_ j$. Every point of $G$ lies in $\operatorname{Int}K_ j$ for all large $j$, so $H=-1$ on $G$. Thus $H$ is a competitor for $G$, and $H\le h_ G$. Conversely, every competitor for $G$ is a competitor for each $K_ j$, hence bounded above by every $H_{K_ j}$ and thus by $H$; so $h_ G\le H$. We have shown $h_ G=H$. As $H$ is upper semicontinuous, $H_ G=h_ G^*=H$; in particular $H_ G=-1$ on $G$. The boundary behavior follows from (5.47.3).
By theorem 7.3.7, $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_{K_ j})^ n\to (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_ G)^ n$ weakly. By proposition 5.47.6, these measures are carried by $K_ j\subset \overline G$. Hence the limit measure vanishes on the open set $B\setminus \overline G$, that is, it is carried by the compact set $\overline G$, and testing with a function in $C_ c(B)$ equal to one on $\overline G$ shows that the total masses converge. Since the Borel sets $K_ j$ increase to $G$, proposition 7.4.3(2) gives $\operatorname {Cap}_ B(K_ j)\to \operatorname {Cap}_ B(G)$. Together with the capacity formula of proposition 5.47.6 for the $K_ j$, this yields $\operatorname {Cap}_ B(G)=\lim _ j\int _ B(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_{K_ j})^ n=\int _ B(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_ G)^ n$. $\square$
Theorem 5.47.8.9421BA4DC329 Let $E$ be a subset of an open ball $B\subset \mathbb C^ n$. The following conditions are equivalent:
$\operatorname {Cap}_ B^*(E)=0$;
$E\subset \{ V=-\infty \} $ for some $V\in \mathrm{PSH}(B)$ with $V\le 0$;
$H_ E=0$ on $B$.
Every pluripolar subset of $B$ satisfies these conditions; in particular it is globally pluripolar in $B$. Consequently, on every complex manifold $X$, a countable union of pluripolar sets is pluripolar, and if $W\subset X$ is open, every subset of $W$ that is pluripolar in $W$ is pluripolar in $X$.
Proof. We prove (2)$\Rightarrow $(1), then (1)$\Rightarrow $(3) for relatively compact sets $E$ and (3)$\Rightarrow $(2), deduce (1)$\Rightarrow $(2) in general by exhaustion, and finally prove (2)$\Rightarrow $(3). The remaining assertions then follow by localization.
(2)$\Rightarrow $(1). We show more generally that every pluripolar set $E\subset B$ satisfies (1); a set as in (2) is pluripolar. By definition 5.47.2, every point of $B$ has an open neighborhood $W\subset B$ carrying a plurisubharmonic function whose pole set contains $E\cap W$. The second assertion of proposition 7.4.4, applied with $D=B$, therefore gives $\operatorname {Cap}_ B^*(E\cap L)=0$ for every compact set $L\subset B$. Exhausting $B$ by countably many compact sets and using countable subadditivity, we obtain $\operatorname {Cap}_ B^*(E)=0$.
(1)$\Rightarrow $(3) when $E\Subset B$. Fix an open set $O$ with $\overline E\subset O\Subset B$. Since $\operatorname {Cap}_ B^*(E)=0$, there are open sets $G_ j'\supset E$ with $\operatorname {Cap}_ B(G_ j')<1/j$. The open sets $G_ j=O\cap G_1'\cap \cdots \cap G_ j'$ decrease, contain $E$, lie in $O$, and satisfy $\operatorname {Cap}_ B(G_ j)\to 0$. Since the $G_ j$ decrease, the functions $H_{G_ j}$ increase; put $H=(\sup _ jH_{G_ j})^*$. By theorem 5.10.2, $H$ is plurisubharmonic, takes values in $[-1,0]$, and is the almost-everywhere limit of the $H_{G_ j}$. By proposition 5.47.7, $\int _ B(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_{G_ j})^ n=\operatorname {Cap}_ B(G_ j)\to 0$, and by theorem 7.6.1 these measures converge weakly to $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H)^ n$. Hence $\int \chi \, (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H)^ n=\lim _ j\int \chi \, (\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H_{G_ j})^ n\le \lim _ j\operatorname {Cap}_ B(G_ j)=0$ for every $\chi \in C_ c(B)$ with $0\le \chi \le 1$, and therefore $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}H)^ n=0$.
Since every $G_ j$ lies in $O$, the barrier (5.47.3), with a constant $A$ chosen for $O$, bounds every $H_{G_ j}$, and hence $H$, from below by one function tending to zero at $\partial B$; thus $H(z)\to 0$ as $z\to \partial B$. The last assertion of the comparison principle (theorem 7.3.11), applied to $u=H$ and $v=0$, gives $H\ge 0$, and therefore $H=0$. Finally, $E\subset G_ j$ gives $H_{G_ j}\le H_ E$ for all $j$; since $H_ E$ is upper semicontinuous, $0=H\le H_ E\le 0$.
(3)$\Rightarrow $(2). Suppose $H_ E=0$, and choose competitors $v_ j$ for $E$ as in (5.47.4). Fix a point $a\in B$ with $v_ j(a)\to 0$, and choose indices $j_1<j_2<\cdots $ with $v_{j_ l}(a)>-2^{-l}$. Since every term is nonpositive, the partial sums of $V=\sum _ lv_{j_ l}$ form a decreasing sequence of nonpositive plurisubharmonic functions, and $V(a)\ge -1$. By theorem 5.10.1, $V$ is plurisubharmonic on $B$; moreover $V\le 0$, and $V=-\infty $ on $E$ because every term is at most $-1$ there.
(1)$\Rightarrow $(2) in general. Let $\operatorname {Cap}_ B^*(E)=0$, and let $(L_ l)$ be an exhaustion of $B$ by compact sets. Each set $E\cap L_ l$ has outer capacity zero and is relatively compact in $B$, so the two preceding steps give $V_ l\in \mathrm{PSH}(B)$ with $V_ l\le 0$ and $E\cap L_ l\subset \{ V_ l=-\infty \} $. The pole sets of the $V_ l$ are Lebesgue null, so there is a point $a\in B$ at which all $V_ l$ are finite. Choose constants $c_ l>0$ with $c_ l|V_ l(a)|\le 2^{-l}$. The partial sums of $\sum _ lc_ lV_ l$ decrease and are at least $-1$ at $a$, so, as in the previous step, $V=\sum _ lc_ lV_ l$ is plurisubharmonic by theorem 5.10.1, and it is nonpositive. Every point of $E$ lies in some $L_ l$, where $c_ lV_ l=-\infty $ while all other terms are nonpositive; hence $V=-\infty $ on $E$.
(2)$\Rightarrow $(3). If $V$ is as in (2), then $\varepsilon V$ is a competitor for $E$ for every $\varepsilon >0$, so $\varepsilon V\le h_ E\le 0$. Letting $\varepsilon \downarrow 0$, we get $h_ E=0$ on the set $\{ V>-\infty \} $. This set has full measure and is therefore dense in $B$, so every neighborhood of a point contains points where $h_ E=0$. Hence $H_ E=h_ E^*\ge 0$, and $H_ E=0$. This completes the proof of the equivalences.
By the proof of (2)$\Rightarrow $(1), every pluripolar subset of $B$ satisfies (1), and hence all three conditions; in particular, it is globally pluripolar in $B$. Now let $X$ be a complex manifold and $E=\bigcup _ mE_ m$, where each $E_ m\subset X$ is pluripolar. Let $x\in X$, and let $B$ be a coordinate ball around $x$, identified with an open ball in $\mathbb C^ n$. Each $E_ m\cap B$ is pluripolar in $B$, so $\operatorname {Cap}_ B^*(E_ m\cap B)=0$ for every $m$, and $\operatorname {Cap}_ B^*(E\cap B)=0$ by countable subadditivity. By (1)$\Rightarrow $(2), the set $E\cap B$ lies in the pole set of a plurisubharmonic function on the connected coordinate neighborhood $B$ of $x$. Hence $E$ is pluripolar.
Finally, let $W\subset X$ be open and let $E\subset W$ be pluripolar in $W$. That $E$ is pluripolar in $X$ is not immediate from definition 5.47.2 at the boundary points of $W$, where a single plurisubharmonic function on a neighborhood must have poles at all nearby points of $E$. Let $x\in X$, and let $U$ be a coordinate ball around $x$, identified with an open ball in $\mathbb C^ n$. The open set $W\cap U$ is a countable union of balls $D_ k$ with $\overline{D_ k}\subset W\cap U$. Each set $E\cap D_ k$ is pluripolar in $U$: at points of $\overline{D_ k}\subset W$ we may use, after restriction to small balls in $U$, the functions provided by the pluripolarity of $E$ in $W$, and every point of $U\setminus \overline{D_ k}$ has a neighborhood disjoint from $D_ k$. By the previous paragraph, applied in $U$, the countable union $E\cap U=\bigcup _ k(E\cap D_ k)$ is pluripolar in $U$, and hence, by the first part of the theorem, it lies in the pole set of a plurisubharmonic function on $U$. Thus $E$ is pluripolar in $X$. $\square$
5.47.9 Global poles on Euclidean spaceAE92E4DE9A4F
Let $E\subset \mathbb C^ n$ be pluripolar. By theorem 5.47.8, for every ball $D$ the set $E\cap D$ lies in the pole set of a plurisubharmonic function on $D$. To obtain a single function on $\mathbb C^ n$, we cannot simply extend such a function by zero outside the ball, since the extended function need not satisfy the submean inequality at the boundary of the ball. For instance, extending $|z|^2-1$ from the unit ball by zero gives $\min \{ |z|^2-1,0\} $. If $|a|=1$ and $0<r<2$, its values on the circle $\{ (1+r\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\theta })a\} $ are $\min \{ 2r\cos \theta +r^2,0\} $; they are nonpositive, and negative for $\cos \theta <-r/2$, so its mean over this circle is negative, whereas its value at $a$ is $0$.
Instead, we use the vanishing of relative extremal functions. It provides functions $u_ j$ with values in $[-1,0]$ that equal $-1$ on a bounded piece of $E$ and have small integral. We glue each of them to a small multiple of $\log ^+|z|-\log R_ j$, where $\log ^+t=\max \{ \log t,0\} $ and $R_ j>1$; this function is negative on the ball $B(0,R_ j)$ and vanishes on its boundary. The small integrals keep the sum of the glued functions locally integrable, while every point of $E$ lies in infinitely many of the pieces.
Theorem 5.47.10 (Josefson).1822741C4B07 Let $E\subset \mathbb C^ n$ be pluripolar. Then there is $V\in \mathrm{PSH}(\mathbb C^ n)$ with $E\subset \{ V=-\infty \} $ and $V(z)\le \log ^+|z|$ for all $z\in \mathbb C^ n$.
Proof. Step 1: the glued functions. Choose compact sets $L_1,L_2,\ldots $ whose interiors cover $\mathbb C^ n$, put $E_ m=E\cap L_ m$, and choose a sequence $(m_ j)_{j\ge 1}$ in which every positive integer occurs infinitely often. Since each $L_ m$ is bounded, we can choose radii $R_ j>1$ increasing to $\infty $ such that
in particular $L_{m_ j}$ lies in the ball $B_ j=B(0,R_ j)$. The set $E\cap B_ j$ is pluripolar in $B_ j$, so by theorem 5.47.8 the relative extremal function of its subset $E_{m_ j}$ with respect to $B_ j$ vanishes identically. The competitors of (5.47.4) for $E_{m_ j}$ in $B_ j$ therefore converge to zero almost everywhere on $B_ j$, and by bounded convergence their integrals over $B_ j$ tend to zero. Since a competitor for $E_{m_ j}$ with values in $[-1,0]$ equals $-1$ on $E_{m_ j}$, one of these competitors, which we call $u_ j$, satisfies
The function $\log ^+|z|=\max \{ \tfrac 12\log |z|^2,0\} $ is plurisubharmonic on $\mathbb C^ n$ by proposition 5.10.3, proposition 5.9.5, and so is $\rho _ j$. On $\partial B_ j$ we have $|z|=R_ j>1$, hence $\rho _ j=0$, while the upper limit of $u_ j$ at every point of $\partial B_ j$ is at most $0$. By proposition 5.9.5, the function $V_ j$ equal to $\max \{ u_ j,\rho _ j\} $ on $B_ j$ and to $\rho _ j$ on $\mathbb C^ n\setminus B_ j$ is plurisubharmonic on $\mathbb C^ n$. Since $\rho _ j\le -1=u_ j$ on $E_{m_ j}$, we have $V_ j=-1$ on $E_{m_ j}$. On $B_ j$ both $u_ j$ and $\rho _ j$ are nonpositive, so $V_ j\le 0$ there, while $V_ j=\rho _ j$ outside $B_ j$; hence
In particular $V_ j$ is locally bounded.
Step 2: the sum. Fix $r>0$ and choose $j_0$ with $R_{j_0}>r$. For $j\ge j_0$ the ball $B(0,r)$ lies in $B_ j$, so $V_ j\le 0$ on $B(0,r)$, and since $V_ j\ge u_ j$ there,
Hence the partial sums of $\sum _{j\ge j_0}V_ j$ decrease on $B(0,r)$, and by monotone convergence their limit $W_ r$ satisfies $\int _{B(0,r)}(-W_ r)\, \mathrm dV_{2n}\le \sum _ j2^{-j}<\infty $. Thus $W_ r$ is not identically $-\infty $, and $W_ r\in \mathrm{PSH}(B(0,r))$ by theorem 5.10.1. At every point of $\mathbb C^ n$ all but finitely many terms of the series $V=\sum _ jV_ j$ are nonpositive, so $V$ is well defined with values in $[-\infty ,\infty )$. On $B(0,r)$ it equals $\sum _{j<j_0}V_ j+W_ r$, a sum of finitely many finite plurisubharmonic functions and a plurisubharmonic function; hence $V$ is plurisubharmonic on $B(0,r)$. As $r$ is arbitrary and plurisubharmonicity is a local property, $V\in \mathrm{PSH}(\mathbb C^ n)$.
Let $z\in E$, so that $z\in E_ m$ for some $m$. Since $m=m_ j$ for infinitely many $j$, infinitely many terms $V_ j(z)$ equal $-1$, while all terms with $R_ j>|z|$ are nonpositive. Hence $V(z)=-\infty $. Finally, summing the upper bounds of Step 1 gives $V\le \sum _ j2^{-j}\log ^+|z|=\log ^+|z|$. $\square$
Corollary 5.47.11.8EF0B17C7325 Let $X$ be a complex manifold of dimension $n$.
If $(u_ i)_{i\in I}$ is a nonempty family in $\mathrm{PSH}(X)$ that is locally uniformly bounded above and $F=\sup _ iu_ i$, then the set $\{ F<F^*\} $ is pluripolar.
If $(u_ j)$ is an increasing sequence in $\mathrm{PSH}(X)$ that is locally uniformly bounded above, then $\lim _ ju_ j=(\sup _ ju_ j)^*$ quasi-everywhere; here $(\sup _ ju_ j)^*$ is plurisubharmonic by theorem 5.10.2.
If $u_1,\ldots ,u_ q$, $1\le q\le n$, are locally bounded plurisubharmonic functions on $X$, then the product $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_1\wedge \cdots \wedge \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ q$ does not charge any Borel pluripolar set. More precisely, in every chart, every pluripolar set has outer measure zero for the trace measure of this product and for the total variations of its coefficient measures.
Proof. (1) Let $x\in X$, and let $B$ be a coordinate ball around $x$, identified with an open ball in $\mathbb C^ n$. On $B$ the regularization $F^*$ is the regularization of $F|_ B$, so by corollary 7.6.2 the set $L\cap \{ F<F^*\} $ has outer capacity zero in $B$ for every compact set $L\subset B$. Exhausting $B$ by countably many compact sets, we obtain $\operatorname {Cap}_ B^*(B\cap \{ F<F^*\} )=0$. By theorem 5.47.8, $B\cap \{ F<F^*\} $ lies in the pole set of a plurisubharmonic function on $B$. Hence $\{ F<F^*\} $ is pluripolar.
(2) For an increasing sequence, $\lim _ ju_ j=\sup _ ju_ j$, so this is the special case of (1) for the family $(u_ j)$.
(3) Let $E$ be pluripolar, and work in a chart, identified with an open set $\Omega \subset \mathbb C^ n$. Let $B'\Subset B\Subset \Omega $ be concentric open balls. The set $E\cap B$ is pluripolar in $B$, so $\operatorname {Cap}_ B^*(E\cap B)=0$ by theorem 5.47.8.
Let $\mu $ be the trace measure of the product, or the total variation of one of its coefficient measures. The restrictions of $u_1,\ldots ,u_ q$ to $B$ form a family that is uniformly bounded on each compact subset of $B$, since $\overline B\subset \Omega $ is compact; so lemma 7.5.7(1), applied to this family and the compact set $\overline{B'}$, gives a constant $C$ with $\mu (A)\le C\operatorname {Cap}_ B(A)$ for every Borel set $A\subset \overline{B'}$. Given $\varepsilon >0$, choose an open set $G\supset E\cap B$ with $\operatorname {Cap}_ B(G)<\varepsilon $; then the outer measure of $E\cap B'$ satisfies $\mu ^*(E\cap B')\le \mu (G\cap B')\le C\operatorname {Cap}_ B(G\cap B')\le C\operatorname {Cap}_ B(G)<C\varepsilon $. Hence $\mu ^*(E\cap B')=0$. Since $\Omega $ is covered by countably many such balls $B'$, the set $E\cap \Omega $ has outer measure zero for $\mu $. For a Borel set $E$ this means that the product does not charge $E$. $\square$
Example 5.47.12.174FD6E0DD10 The torus $\mathbb T^2=\{ z\in \mathbb C^2:|z_1|=|z_2|=1\} $ is real polar, in the sense of section 5.10, but not pluripolar.
To see that $\mathbb T^2$ is real polar, let $\mu $ be the probability measure on $\mathbb T^2$ obtained as the image of $(2\pi )^{-2}\, \mathrm d\theta $ on $[-\pi ,\pi )^2$ under $\theta \mapsto (\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\theta _1},\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\theta _2})$, and put
If we identify $\mathbb C^2$ with $\mathbb R^4$, then $u$ is a positive multiple of the fundamental potential $E_4*\mu $, so it is subharmonic on $\mathbb R^4$ by proposition 3.4.11. It is finite off $\mathbb T^2$, since for $z\notin \mathbb T^2$ the distances $|z-\zeta |$, $\zeta \in \mathbb T^2$, are bounded below by the distance from $z$ to the compact set $\mathbb T^2$. Now let $z=(\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\alpha _1},\mathrm e^{\mathrm i\alpha _2})\in \mathbb T^2$. By rotation invariance, $\mu $ is also the image of $(2\pi )^{-2}\, \mathrm d\theta $ under $\theta \mapsto \zeta (\theta )=(\mathrm e^{\mathrm i(\alpha _1+\theta _1)},\mathrm e^{\mathrm i(\alpha _2+\theta _2)})$, and
Hence
so $\mathbb T^2\subset \{ u=-\infty \} $, and $\mathbb T^2$ is real polar.
Suppose that $\mathbb T^2$ were pluripolar. By theorem 5.47.10 there would be $V\in \mathrm{PSH}(\mathbb C^2)$ with $\mathbb T^2\subset \{ V=-\infty \} $. Fix $c\in \mathbb C$ with $|c|=1$. By proposition 5.9.3, the function $f(\zeta )=V(\zeta ,c)$ is either identically $-\infty $ or subharmonic on $\mathbb C$, and $f=-\infty $ on the unit circle. In the second case, upper semicontinuity gives $\varlimsup _{\zeta \to \zeta _0}f(\zeta )\le f(\zeta _0)=-\infty $ at every point $\zeta _0$ of the unit circle, and the maximum principle (proposition 3.4.7), applied to $f+M$ on the unit disc for every $M>0$, shows that $f=-\infty $ on the unit disc. Hence $V=-\infty $ on $\{ |z_1|\le 1,\ |z_2|=1\} $. Now fix $z_1$ with $|z_1|<1$; the function $w\mapsto V(z_1,w)$ equals $-\infty $ on the unit circle, and the same argument shows that it equals $-\infty $ on the unit disc. Thus $V=-\infty $ on the open bidisc $\{ |z_1|<1,\ |z_2|<1\} $, contradicting the local integrability of $V$ (theorem 5.9.1).
For $n\ge 3$, the same arguments show that $\mathbb T^2\times \mathbb C^{n-2}\subset \mathbb C^ n$ is real polar but not pluripolar. The function $U(z)=u(z_1,z_2)$ is subharmonic on $\mathbb R^{2n}$, by lemma 4.2.7 with $k=4$ and $d=2n$. The function $U$ is finite off $\mathbb T^2\times \mathbb C^{n-2}$ and equal to $-\infty $ on it. If the set were pluripolar, theorem 5.47.10 would give $V\in \mathrm{PSH}(\mathbb C^ n)$ with poles on it, and the argument above, with the last $n-2$ coordinates fixed, would show that $V=-\infty $ on the product of the open bidisc with $\mathbb C^{n-2}$, which is again impossible.
5.47.13 Thinness and plurifine neighborhoods333115F369F9
The classical fine topology of definition 4.2.2 is the coarsest topology that contains the Euclidean topology and makes all subharmonic functions continuous. Replacing subharmonic by plurisubharmonic functions, we obtain the plurifine topology, whose terminology below parallels that of subsection 4.2.1. On an open subset of $\mathbb C^ n=\mathbb R^{2n}$ every plurisubharmonic function is subharmonic (theorem 5.9.1), so every plurifine open set is finely open. The main results of this section, a base of plurifine neighborhoods and the positive volume of plurifine open sets, are the plurifine counterparts of proposition 4.2.4, proposition 4.2.5.
For $n=1$ the two topologies coincide. Indeed, let $V\subset \mathbb C$ be open, let $u\in \mathrm{SH}(V)$, and let $V'$ be the union of the connected components of $V$ on which $u$ is not identically $-\infty $. Then $u|_{V'}$ is a plurisubharmonic function on $V'$, and $u=-\infty $ on $V\setminus V'$; hence for every $t\in \mathbb R$ the superlevel set $\{ u>t\} $ is a superlevel set of $u|_{V'}$, which is plurifine open, while the sublevel sets $\{ u<s\} $ are Euclidean open. Thus every subharmonic function is continuous for the plurifine topology, and every finely open set is plurifine open. For $n\ge 2$ the plurifine topology is strictly coarser (proposition 4.2.25, example 5.47.17).
Definition 5.47.14.09A00D4B8096 Let $X$ be a complex manifold. The plurifine topology on $X$ is the coarsest topology on $X$ that contains the topology of $X$, which we call the Euclidean topology, and makes every $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(V)$, for every open set $V\subset X$, continuous as a map from $V$ with the induced topology to $[-\infty ,\infty )$. Sets that are open in this topology are called plurifine open, and neighborhoods in this topology are called plurifine neighborhoods. A set $E\subset X$ is plurithin at a point $a\in X$ if either $a$ does not belong to the Euclidean closure of $E\setminus \{ a\} $, or there is a plurisubharmonic function $\psi $ on a Euclidean open neighborhood of $a$ such that $\psi (a)$ is finite and
where the upper limit is taken with respect to the Euclidean topology.
Since the sublevel sets $\{ u<s\} $ of upper semicontinuous functions are Euclidean open, the plurifine topology has a subbasis consisting of the Euclidean open sets and the sets $\{ z\in V:u(z)>t\} $, where $V\subset X$ is open, $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(V)$ and $t\in \mathbb R$. Because $\{ u>t\} =\{ \max \{ u,t-1\} >t\} $, it suffices to use locally bounded functions $u$ here.
On $\mathbb C^ n$ one may even use finite plurisubharmonic functions defined on all of $\mathbb C^ n$. Indeed, let $u$ be plurisubharmonic on a neighborhood of a closed ball $\overline{B(a,r)}$, with $m\le u\le M$ on $B(a,r)$. Choose $A>0$ so large that the function $q(z)=m-1+A(|z-a|^2-r^2/16)$ exceeds $M$ where $|z-a|\ge r/2$, and note that $q<m$ on $B(a,r/4)$. By proposition 5.9.5, the function equal to $\max \{ u,q\} $ on $B(a,r)$ and to $q$ outside $B(a,r)$ is plurisubharmonic on $\mathbb C^ n$; it is finite and coincides with $u$ on $B(a,r/4)$. Hence, for every $t\in \mathbb R$, the set $B(a,r/4)\cap \{ u>t\} $ is the intersection of a ball with a superlevel set of a finite plurisubharmonic function on $\mathbb C^ n$, and every subbasic set $\{ z\in V:u(z)>t\} $ with locally bounded $u$ is a union of such sets. Since, moreover, the functions $\pm \operatorname{Re}z_ j$ and $\pm \operatorname{Im}z_ j$ are finite and plurisubharmonic on $\mathbb C^ n$ and generate the Euclidean topology, the plurifine topology of $\mathbb C^ n$ is the coarsest topology that makes all finite plurisubharmonic functions on $\mathbb C^ n$ continuous.
The superlevel sets $\{ u>t\} $ need not be Euclidean open. For example, let $D=\{ z\in \mathbb C^ n:|z_1|<1/2\} $, put $a_ j=\mathrm e^{-j}$ for $j\ge 1$, and let $u=\sum _{j\ge 1}2^{-j}\log |z_1-a_ j|$ on $D$. Each term is a positive multiple of the function $\log |z_1-a_ j|^2$, which is plurisubharmonic on the domain $D$ by proposition 5.10.3, and each term is negative on $D$, because $|z_1-a_ j|<1/2+\mathrm e^{-1}<1$. Hence the partial sums form a decreasing sequence of plurisubharmonic functions (proposition 5.9.5), and since $u(0)=-\sum _ jj2^{-j}=-2$ is finite, $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(D)$ by theorem 5.10.1. The point $0$ lies in the plurifine open set $\{ u>-3\} $, whereas the points $(a_ j,0,\ldots ,0)$, at which $u=-\infty $, converge to $0$. Thus $\{ u>-3\} $ is not a Euclidean neighborhood of $0$.
Proposition 5.47.15.2297E8BC91FF Let $X$ be a complex manifold and $a\in X$.
A set $U\subset X$ containing $a$ is a plurifine neighborhood of $a$ if and only if $X\setminus U$ is plurithin at $a$.
In a chart around $a$, the sets $B\cap \{ \psi >0\} $ containing $a$, where $B$ is a sufficiently small coordinate ball centered at $a$ and $\psi $ is a bounded plurisubharmonic function on a neighborhood of $\overline B$, form a base of plurifine neighborhoods of $a$.
The plurifine topology of an open subset of $X$ is the topology induced by the plurifine topology of $X$. Biholomorphic maps are homeomorphisms for the plurifine topologies, and holomorphic maps between complex manifolds are continuous for the plurifine topologies.
Proof. We begin with the first two assertions of (3). Let $W\subset X$ be open. Every subbasic set of the plurifine topology of $W$ is a subbasic set of the plurifine topology of $X$. Conversely, the intersection of a subbasic set of $X$ with $W$ is subbasic for $W$, because the restriction of a function $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(V)$ to $V\cap W$ is plurisubharmonic. Since the sets $S\cap W$, with $S$ subbasic for $X$, form a subbasis of the induced topology, the plurifine topology of $W$ is the induced topology.
Next, if $F$ is a biholomorphism, then $F^{-1}(\{ u>t\} )=\{ u\circ F>t\} $, and $u\circ F$ is plurisubharmonic whenever $u$ is. Indeed, by proposition 5.9.3, in connected charts $u\circ F$ is plurisubharmonic or identically $-\infty $, and the second alternative would make $u$ identically $-\infty $ on a nonempty open set, which is impossible because $u$ is locally integrable (theorem 5.9.1). Applying this to $F$ and to $F^{-1}$, we see that both map subbasic sets to subbasic sets. In particular, we may compute plurifine neighborhoods of $a$ in a chart, as if $X$ were an open subset of $\mathbb C^ n$.
(2) Each set $B\cap \{ \psi >0\} $ as in (2) is plurifine open, as the intersection of a Euclidean open set with a subbasic set. Now let $N$ be a plurifine neighborhood of $a$. By the definition of the topology, $N$ contains a set
containing $a$, where $W_0$ is a Euclidean open neighborhood of $a$, $k\ge 0$, each $u_ i$ is plurisubharmonic on a Euclidean open neighborhood $V_ i$ of $a$, and $c_ i\in \mathbb R$. If $k=0$, every coordinate ball $B\subset W_0$ centered at $a$ works, with $\psi =1$. Let $k\ge 1$. Replacing $u_ i$ by $\max \{ u_ i,c_ i-1\} $, which does not change $\{ u_ i>c_ i\} $, we may assume that the $u_ i$ are locally bounded. Put $\delta _ i=u_ i(a)-c_ i>0$. By upper semicontinuity there is a coordinate ball $B'$ centered at $a$, contained in $W_0$ and in every $V_ i$, on which every $u_ i$ is bounded and satisfies $u_ i<u_ i(a)+\delta _ i/(2k)$. Let $B$ be any coordinate ball centered at $a$ with $\overline B\subset B'$, and put
This is a bounded plurisubharmonic function on $B'$ with $\psi (a)=1/4>0$. If $z\in B$ and $u_ i(z)\le c_ i$ for some $i$, then the $i$-th term of the sum is at most $-1$ and each of the other $k-1$ terms is less than $1/(2k)$, so $\psi (z)\le 1/4-1+(k-1)/(2k)<0$. Hence $B\cap \{ \psi >0\} \subset N_0\subset N$, which proves (2).
(1) Let $U$ be a plurifine neighborhood of $a$, and put $E=X\setminus U$; note that $a\notin E$. By (2), $U$ contains a set $B\cap \{ \psi >0\} $ with $\psi (a)>0$, so $\psi \le 0$ on $E\cap B$. Hence either $a$ is not in the Euclidean closure of $E$, or $\varlimsup _{E\ni z\to a}\psi (z)\le 0<\psi (a)$; in both cases $E$ is plurithin at $a$. Conversely, suppose that $E=X\setminus U$ is plurithin at $a\in U$. If $a$ is not in the Euclidean closure of $E$, then $U$ contains a Euclidean neighborhood of $a$. Otherwise let $\psi $ be as in definition 5.47.14, and choose $c$ with $\varlimsup _{E\ni z\to a}\psi (z)<c<\psi (a)$. Then $\psi <c$ on $E\cap B$ for a small ball $B$ centered at $a$, so the plurifine open set $B\cap \{ \psi >c\} $ contains $a$ and is contained in $U$.
(3) It remains to prove that a holomorphic map $F\colon Y\to X$ is continuous for the plurifine topologies. Preimages of Euclidean open sets are Euclidean open. Let $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(V)$ with $V\subset X$ open, let $t\in \mathbb R$, and let $y\in F^{-1}(\{ u>t\} )$. Choose a connected coordinate neighborhood $Y'$ of $y$ such that $F(Y')$ lies in a connected coordinate neighborhood contained in $V$. By proposition 5.9.3, $u\circ F$ is either identically $-\infty $ or plurisubharmonic on $Y'$; the first alternative is excluded because $u(F(y))>t$. Thus $Y'\cap \{ u\circ F>t\} $ is a plurifine open neighborhood of $y$ contained in $F^{-1}(\{ u>t\} )$. Hence preimages of subbasic sets are plurifine open. $\square$
Proposition 5.47.16.DD1F66C6842A Let $X$ be a complex manifold.
Every nonempty plurifine open subset of $X$ contains a Borel set of positive Lebesgue measure in some chart.
The complement of every pluripolar set is dense for the plurifine topology.
For every $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X)$, the set $\{ u>-\infty \} $ is plurifine open.
Proof. (1) Let $O$ be a nonempty plurifine open set and $a\in O$. By proposition 5.47.15(2), $O$ contains a set $A=B\cap \{ \psi >0\} $ with $a\in A$, where $B$ is a coordinate ball and $\psi $ is a bounded plurisubharmonic function on a neighborhood of $\overline B$. This set is Borel because $\psi $ is upper semicontinuous. If $A$ had measure zero, then $\max \{ \psi ,0\} =0$ almost everywhere on $B$; since both functions are plurisubharmonic on $B$, they would coincide everywhere by the uniqueness in theorem 5.9.1, contradicting $\psi (a)>0$.
(2) A pluripolar set is Lebesgue null in every chart, so by (1) it contains no nonempty plurifine open set. Equivalently, its complement meets every nonempty plurifine open set.
(3) The set $\{ u>-\infty \} =\bigcup _ m\{ u>-m\} $ is a union of subbasic plurifine open sets. $\square$
Example 5.47.17.7E1189000F74 Let $n\ge 2$ and $H=\{ z\in \mathbb C^ n:z_1=0\} $. Then $H$ is pluripolar, being the pole set of $\log |z_1|^2$ (proposition 5.10.3), but no point of $H$ is isolated in the topology induced on $H$ by the plurifine topology. This is the second assertion of proposition 4.2.25, because the topology $\tau $ of that proposition is the plurifine topology. Indeed, every $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(V)$, with $V\subset \mathbb C^ n$ open, satisfies the conditions in the definition of $\tau $, so every plurifine open set is open for $\tau $. Conversely, let $u\colon V\to [-\infty ,\infty )$ be as in the definition of $\tau $. By definition 5.8.1, $u$ is plurisubharmonic on the union $V'$ of the connected components of $V$ on which it is not identically $-\infty $. Hence its superlevel sets $\{ u>t\} =\{ z\in V':u(z)>t\} $, $t\in \mathbb R$, are plurifine open, while its sublevel sets are Euclidean open. Thus $u$ is continuous for the plurifine topology, and every $\tau $-open set is plurifine open.
Consequently, neither conclusion of proposition 4.2.6 carries over to pluripolar sets: $H$ is not plurifinely discrete, and for $a\in H$ the pluripolar set $H\setminus \{ a\} $ is not plurifine closed, since every plurifine neighborhood of $a$ meets it.
Example 5.47.18.02396DC16057 For every $n\ge 1$ there is a plurifine open subset of $\mathbb C^ n$ that is not a Borel set.
Let $K\subset [0,1/10]\subset \mathbb C$ be the compact polar set and $\mu $ the atom-free probability measure carried by $K$ of proposition 4.1.12, and put $F(x)=\mu (K\cap (-\infty ,x])$ for $x\in \mathbb R$. The function $F$ is nondecreasing, $F=0$ on $(-\infty ,0)$ and $F=1$ on $[1/10,\infty )$. It is continuous: it is right continuous because $\mu $ is finite, and its jump at $x$ is $\mu (K\cap \{ x\} )=0$, because $\mu $ has no atoms. For $y\in (0,1)$ the set $\{ x\in \mathbb R:F(x)\ge y\} $ is closed, nonempty and bounded below, and we let $g(y)$ be its smallest element. Then $F(g(y))\ge y$, and $F(x)<y$ for $x<g(y)$, so $F(g(y))=y$ because $F$ is continuous at $g(y)$. Hence $g$ is injective; it is also nondecreasing, so $g$ is strictly increasing and in particular Borel measurable. Moreover $g(y)\in K$. Otherwise, since $K$ is closed, there is $\delta >0$ with $[g(y)-\delta ,g(y)]\cap K=\varnothing $; then $F(g(y)-\delta )=F(g(y))=y$, which contradicts the minimality of $g(y)$.
Let $N\subset (0,1)$ be a set that is not Lebesgue measurable, and put $A=g(N)\subset K$. Since $g$ is injective, $N=g^{-1}(A)$; so if $A$ were a Borel subset of $\mathbb C$, then $A=A\cap \mathbb R$ would be a Borel subset of $\mathbb R$, and $N$ would be a Borel set. Hence $A$ is not a Borel subset of $\mathbb C$. As a subset of the polar set $K$, the set $A$ is polar, hence finely closed in $\mathbb C=\mathbb R^2$ by proposition 4.2.6. Since the fine and the plurifine topologies of $\mathbb C$ coincide, as shown at the beginning of this section, $W_1=\mathbb C\setminus A$ is a plurifine open subset of $\mathbb C$ which is not Borel. For $n\ge 2$, the set $W=W_1\times \mathbb C^{n-1}$ is the preimage of $W_1$ under the holomorphic projection $z\mapsto z_1$, so it is plurifine open by proposition 5.47.15(3). It is not Borel, because $W_1$ is its preimage under the continuous map $\zeta \mapsto (\zeta ,0,\ldots ,0)$.
5.47.19 Countable selections and plurifine locality03B3029EB4B3
The plurifine topology is in general not Lindelöf: in dimension one it is the classical fine topology of $\mathbb C=\mathbb R^2$, which is not Lindelöf by example 4.2.8. As in theorem 4.2.22, countability is recovered outside an exceptional set, which is now pluripolar. Since Bedford–Taylor products of locally bounded potentials do not charge pluripolar sets (corollary 5.47.11(3)), this allows us to pass from the local identity of lemma 5.47.21 to locality on arbitrary plurifine open sets. Applied to the truncations $\max \{ u,-k\} $ of unbounded potentials, plurifine locality shows that their products for different levels $k\ge m$ agree on the set where all the potentials exceed $-m$.
Theorem 5.47.20.17D9EEFA42DF Let $X$ be a complex manifold with a countable basis.
For every family $(U_ i)_{i\in I}$ of plurifine open subsets of $X$, there is a countable set $J\subset I$ such that $\bigcup _{i\in I}U_ i\setminus \bigcup _{j\in J}U_ j$ is pluripolar.
Every plurifine open set $U\subset X$ contains countably many sets $A_ k=Q_ k\cap \{ \psi _ k>0\} $, where each $Q_ k$ is a coordinate ball and $\psi _ k$ is a bounded plurisubharmonic function on $Q_ k$, such that $U\setminus \bigcup _ kA_ k$ is pluripolar. In particular, $U$ contains the Borel set $V=\bigcup _ kA_ k$, and $U\setminus V$ is pluripolar. Consequently, if $C\subset X$ is a chart domain and $\mu $ is a positive Borel measure on $C$ for which every pluripolar subset of $C$ has outer measure zero, then $U\cap C$ is measurable for the completion of $\mu $.
Proof. Since $X$ has a countable basis, it is covered by countably many charts; in each chart, the coordinate balls with rational centers and radii and with closure in the chart domain form a countable basis. Let $\mathcal Q$ be the union of these countable families; it is a countable basis of $X$.
(1) Let $U=\bigcup _ iU_ i$; if $I$ is empty, take $J$ empty. We call a set basic if it has the form $Q\cap \{ \psi >0\} $, where $Q\in \mathcal Q$ and $\psi $ is a bounded plurisubharmonic function on a neighborhood of $\overline Q$. Every point $a\in U$ lies in a basic set contained in some $U_ i$: if $a\in U_ i$, then proposition 5.47.15(2) gives a ball $B$ and a bounded plurisubharmonic function $\psi $ on a neighborhood of $\overline B$ with $a\in B\cap \{ \psi >0\} \subset U_ i$, and it suffices to choose $Q\in \mathcal Q$ with $a\in Q\subset B$.
Fix $Q\in \mathcal Q$, and let $\Psi _ Q$ be the set of bounded plurisubharmonic functions $\psi $ on neighborhoods of $\overline Q$ for which the basic set $Q\cap \{ \psi >0\} $ is contained in some $U_ i$. If $\Psi _ Q$ is empty, we put $P_ Q=\varnothing $ and select nothing for this $Q$. Otherwise, we may assume that all members of $\Psi _ Q$ take values in $[-1,1]$ on $Q$, since replacing $\psi $ by $\psi /c$, where $c>0$ bounds $|\psi |$ on $Q$, does not change $Q\cap \{ \psi >0\} $.
Let $F_ Q$ be the pointwise supremum of the members of $\Psi _ Q$ on $Q$. By Choquet's lemma (lemma 3.4.22) there are $\psi _{Q,1},\psi _{Q,2},\ldots $ in $\Psi _ Q$ whose supremum $F_ Q'$ satisfies $(F_ Q')^*=F_ Q^*$. By corollary 5.47.11(1) and the last assertion of theorem 5.47.8, the set $P_ Q=\{ F_ Q<F_ Q^*\} \cup \{ F_ Q'<(F_ Q')^*\} $ is pluripolar in $Q$, and hence in $X$. If $z\in Q\setminus P_ Q$ and $\psi (z)>0$ for some $\psi \in \Psi _ Q$, then $F_ Q'(z)=F_ Q^*(z)=F_ Q(z)>0$, so $\psi _{Q,k}(z)>0$ for some $k$. Therefore
For each $Q$ and $k$ choose an index $i(Q,k)\in I$ with $Q\cap \{ \psi _{Q,k}>0\} \subset U_{i(Q,k)}$, and let $J$ be the countable set of these indices. Every point of $U$ lies in some basic set $Q\cap \{ \psi >0\} $ with $\psi \in \Psi _ Q$, so $U\setminus \bigcup _{j\in J}U_ j$ is contained in $\bigcup _ QP_ Q$. This countable union of pluripolar sets is pluripolar by theorem 5.47.8.
(2) Apply the construction of (1) to the family consisting of the single set $U$. It selects countably many sets $Q\cap \{ \psi _{Q,k}>0\} $, where $Q\in \mathcal Q$ is a coordinate ball and $\psi _{Q,k}$ restricts to a bounded plurisubharmonic function on $Q$; these sets are contained in $U$, and their union $V$ satisfies $U\setminus V\subset \bigcup _ QP_ Q$, which is pluripolar. Each selected set is Borel, because $\psi _{Q,k}$ is upper semicontinuous, so the countable union $V$ is Borel. Finally, let $C$ and $\mu $ be as in the statement. The set $(U\setminus V)\cap C$ is pluripolar in $C$, so it has outer $\mu $-measure zero and is a null set for the completion of $\mu $. Since $U\cap C=(V\cap C)\cup \bigl ((U\setminus V)\cap C\bigr )$ and $V\cap C$ is Borel, $U\cap C$ is measurable for the completion of $\mu $. $\square$
We now turn to Bedford–Taylor products. The first step is their locality on a single superlevel set of a plurisubharmonic function, which we derive from their locality on the sets $\{ u>v\} $ (proposition 7.3.10).
Lemma 5.47.21.FA3C3BD45E57 Let $\Omega \subset \mathbb C^ n$ be open, let $T$ be a closed positive current of bidimension $(r,r)$ on $\Omega $, let $u$ and $v$ be locally bounded plurisubharmonic functions on $\Omega $, and let $t\in \mathrm{PSH}(\Omega )$. If $u=v$ on $\{ t>0\} $, then, for every integer $0\le p\le r$,
Proof. Replacing $t$ by $\max \{ t,0\} $, which is plurisubharmonic (proposition 5.9.5) and has the same set $\{ t>0\} $, we may assume that $t\ge 0$. Then $t$ is locally bounded, because plurisubharmonic functions are bounded above on compact sets, and $u+\varepsilon t$ is a locally bounded plurisubharmonic function for every $\varepsilon >0$. For $\varepsilon >0$ put $w_\varepsilon =\max \{ u+\varepsilon t,v\} $. On $\{ t>0\} $ we have $u+\varepsilon t>u=v$, so $\{ t>0\} \subset \{ u+\varepsilon t>v\} $, and proposition 7.3.10, applied to $u+\varepsilon t$ and $v$, gives
Multiplying by $t$, which vanishes outside $\{ t>0\} $, we obtain $t(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}w_\varepsilon )^ p\wedge T=t(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(u+\varepsilon t))^ p\wedge T$. As $\varepsilon $ decreases to zero along a sequence, $w_\varepsilon $ decreases to $\max \{ u,v\} $ and $u+\varepsilon t$ decreases to $u$, because $t\ge 0$. The weighted form of theorem 7.3.7, with the constant sequence of weights equal to $t$, therefore yields
Interchanging the roles of $u$ and $v$, we also get $t(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\max \{ u,v\} )^ p\wedge T=t(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v)^ p\wedge T$, and hence $t(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u)^ p\wedge T=t(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v)^ p\wedge T$. Finally, multiply the coefficient measures of both sides by $1/(t+\delta )$ and let $\delta \downarrow 0$. Since $t/(t+\delta )\to \mathbf1_{\{ t>0\} }$ pointwise and boundedly, dominated convergence with respect to the total variations of the coefficient measures gives the assertion. $\square$
Bedford–Taylor products are local in the plurifine topology, in the following sense.
Theorem 5.47.22.C1A6B45ED829 Let $X$ be a complex manifold of dimension $n$, let $1\le q\le n$ be an integer, and let $u_1,\ldots ,u_ q$ and $v_1,\ldots ,v_ q$ be locally bounded plurisubharmonic functions on $X$. If $u_ l=v_ l$ on a plurifine open set $W\subset X$ for every $l$, then
Here $W$ need not be Borel (example 5.47.18). It is measurable for the completions of the total variations of the coefficient measures of both products, and $\mathbf1_ W$ acts on these completed measures; up to null sets of these measures, $W$ coincides with a Borel set.
Proof. The identity and the measurability of $W$ are local properties, so we may assume that $X$ is an open ball in $\mathbb C^ n$; by proposition 5.47.15(3), the intersection of $W$ with this ball is plurifine open in the ball. Write $S_ u=\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_1\wedge \cdots \wedge \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ q$ and $S_ v=\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_1\wedge \cdots \wedge \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_ q$. We first prove the identity on sets of the form $Q\cap \{ \psi >0\} $, and then cover $W$ by countably many such sets up to a pluripolar set, which the products do not charge.
Step 1: basic sets. We show that $\mathbf1_ AS_ u=\mathbf1_ AS_ v$ whenever $Q\subset X$ is open, $\psi \in \mathrm{PSH}(Q)$ and $A=Q\cap \{ \psi >0\} \subset W$. For every nonempty set $I\subset \{ 1,\ldots ,q\} $, the functions $u_ I=\sum _{l\in I}u_ l$ and $v_ I=\sum _{l\in I}v_ l$ are locally bounded and plurisubharmonic on $Q$, and they coincide on $A$, because $u_ l=v_ l$ on $W$. By lemma 5.47.21, applied on $Q$ with $t=\psi $, $T=1$ and $p=q$, we have $\mathbf1_ A(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ I)^ q=\mathbf1_ A(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_ I)^ q$.
We now recover $S_ u$ from the products $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ I)^ q$ by polarization. For a multi-index $\alpha \in \mathbb N^ q$ with $|\alpha |=q$, let $S_ u^\alpha $ be the product of $q$ factors in which $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ l$ occurs $\alpha _ l$ times; it does not depend on the order of the factors, because products of locally bounded plurisubharmonic functions are symmetric (theorem 7.3.7). Since these products are also additive in each factor (proposition 7.2.2(3)), expanding $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ I)^ q$ with $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ I=\sum _{l\in I}\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ l$ gives, exactly as in the multinomial expansion of $(\sum _{l\in I}x_ l)^ q$,
where $\alpha $ ranges over the multi-indices with $|\alpha |=q$ and $\alpha _ l=0$ for $l\notin I$. Multiplying by $(-1)^{q-|I|}$ and summing over the nonempty sets $I\subset \{ 1,\ldots ,q\} $, we obtain $\sum _\alpha c_\alpha S_ u^\alpha $, summed over all $\alpha $ with $|\alpha |=q$, where $c_\alpha $ is the coefficient of the monomial $x^\alpha $ on the right-hand side of the polarization identity (7.3.9) with $N=q$ (in which the term with $I=\varnothing $ vanishes). Both sides of that identity are polynomials in $x_1,\ldots ,x_ q$ that agree on $\mathbb R^ q$, so they have the same coefficients: $c_\alpha =q!$ if $\alpha =(1,\ldots ,1)$, and $c_\alpha =0$ otherwise. Since $S_ u^{(1,\ldots ,1)}=S_ u$, we obtain
The same identity holds for the $v_ l$. Multiplying both identities by $\mathbf1_ A$ and using $\mathbf1_ A(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ I)^ q=\mathbf1_ A(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v_ I)^ q$, we obtain $\mathbf1_ AS_ u=\mathbf1_ AS_ v$.
Step 2: countable selection. By theorem 5.47.20(2), applied to the ball $X$ and its plurifine open subset $W$, there are countably many sets $A_ k=Q_ k\cap \{ \psi _ k>0\} \subset W$, with $Q_ k\subset X$ open and $\psi _ k\in \mathrm{PSH}(Q_ k)$, whose union $V$ is Borel and such that $W\setminus V$ is pluripolar. By corollary 5.47.11(3), every pluripolar subset of $X$ has outer measure zero for the total variations of the coefficient measures of $S_ u$ and $S_ v$. Hence, by the last assertion of theorem 5.47.20(2), $W$ is measurable for their completions; moreover $W\setminus V$ is a null set for them, so $\mathbf1_ WS_ u=\mathbf1_ VS_ u$ and $\mathbf1_ WS_ v=\mathbf1_ VS_ v$. The Borel sets $A_ k'=A_ k\setminus (A_1\cup \cdots \cup A_{k-1})$ partition $V$, and Step 1 gives $\mathbf1_{A_ k'}S_ u=\mathbf1_{A_ k'}\mathbf1_{A_ k}S_ u=\mathbf1_{A_ k'}\mathbf1_{A_ k}S_ v=\mathbf1_{A_ k'}S_ v$. Summing over $k$, by countable additivity of the coefficient measures, we obtain $\mathbf1_ VS_ u=\mathbf1_ VS_ v$, which proves the theorem. $\square$
Step 1 of this proof works, with the same argument, for products $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_1\wedge \cdots \wedge \mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_ q\wedge T$ with an arbitrary closed positive current $T$, because lemma 5.47.21 does. Step 2 does not: such a current may charge pluripolar sets, and then the exceptional set $W\setminus V$ cannot be neglected. For instance, if $H=\{ z\in \mathbb C^ n:z_1=0\} $, the current of integration $[H]$ of example 5.3.9 has the trace measure $[H]\wedge \beta ^{n-1}$, which is $(n-1)!$ times the $(2n-2)$-dimensional Lebesgue measure of $H$, because the restriction of $\beta ^{n-1}/(n-1)!$ to $H$ is the Euclidean volume form of $H$; so it gives positive mass to $H$, which is pluripolar as the pole set of $\log |z_1|^2$.
Proposition 5.47.23.983478512954 Let $\Omega \subset \mathbb C^ n$ be open, let $1\le q\le n$ be an integer, and let $u_1,\ldots ,u_ q\in \mathrm{PSH}(\Omega )$. For every integer $m\ge 1$ put
Then, for all integers $k\ge m\ge 1$,
The restrictions $\mu _ m=\mathbf1_{E_ m}\mu _{S_ m}$ of the trace measures $\mu _{S_ m}$ (definition 5.3.5) increase with $m$, and every pluripolar subset of $\Omega $ has outer measure zero for each $\mu _ m$. Their increasing limit $\mu =\lim _ m\mu _ m$ is a Borel measure on $\Omega $, possibly of infinite mass on compact sets, for which every pluripolar subset of $\Omega $ also has outer measure zero.
Proof. Each set $\{ u_ l>-m\} $ is a subbasic plurifine open set, so $E_ m$ is plurifine open; it is also Borel. On $E_ m$ we have $u_ l>-m$, and hence $u_ l^{(k)}=u_ l=u_ l^{(m)}$ for all $l$ and all $k\ge m$. The truncations are locally bounded plurisubharmonic functions, so theorem 5.47.22 gives $\mathbf1_{E_ m}S_ k=\mathbf1_{E_ m}S_ m$. Taking trace measures, and using $E_ m\subset E_ k$ and the positivity of $\mu _{S_ k}$, we obtain $\mu _ m=\mathbf1_{E_ m}\mu _{S_ k}\le \mathbf1_{E_ k}\mu _{S_ k}=\mu _ k$. By corollary 5.47.11(3), every pluripolar subset of $\Omega $ has outer measure zero for $\mu _{S_ m}$, and hence for $\mu _ m$.
For a Borel set $A\subset \Omega $ put $\mu (A)=\lim _ m\mu _ m(A)\in [0,\infty ]$. If $A$ is the disjoint union of Borel sets $A_ i$, then
by monotone convergence for series of nonnegative terms that increase with $m$. Thus $\mu $ is a Borel measure. Finally, let $N\subset \Omega $ be pluripolar. Since $N$ has outer measure zero for each $\mu _ m$, there are Borel sets $G_{m,i}\supset N$ with $\mu _ m(G_{m,i})<1/i$ for all $m,i\ge 1$. The Borel set $G=\bigcap _{m,i}G_{m,i}$ contains $N$ and satisfies $\mu _ m(G)=0$ for every $m$, hence $\mu (G)=0$. Thus $N$ has outer measure zero for $\mu $. $\square$
In general $\mu $ is not locally finite (example 13.2.9), so a separate local mass estimate is needed before the restrictions $\mathbf1_{E_ m}S_ m$ can define a current of order zero in the limit; this is the subject of section 13.1.
5.47.24 Common poles and quasi-extrema6AAE49F7183F
Let $\varphi $ and $\psi $ be plurisubharmonic functions on an open set $\Omega \subset \mathbb C^ n$. Their difference $\varphi -\psi $ is defined, with values in $[-\infty ,\infty ]$, outside the common pole set $\{ \varphi =\psi =-\infty \} $, on which it would be the meaningless expression $-\infty -(-\infty )$. We show that $\varphi -\psi $ is plurifinely continuous off the common pole set, and that its supremum and infimum over a plurifine open set do not change when an arbitrary pluripolar set containing the common poles is removed.
Proposition 5.47.25.6EBEFACB2203 Let $\Omega \subset \mathbb C^ n$ be open, let $\varphi ,\psi \in \mathrm{PSH}(\Omega )$, and put $P=\{ \varphi =\psi =-\infty \} $. Then $P$ is plurifine closed and pluripolar, and the function $\varphi -\psi $ is continuous from the plurifine open set $\Omega \setminus P$, with the plurifine topology, to $[-\infty ,\infty ]$. The same holds for $\varphi -\psi +b$, for every continuous real function $b$ on $\Omega $.
Proof. The function $\varphi $ is plurifinely continuous with values in $[-\infty ,\infty )$, and $\{ -\infty \} $ is closed in $[-\infty ,\infty )$; hence the pole set $\{ \varphi =-\infty \} $ is plurifine closed. The same holds for $\psi $, so $P$ is plurifine closed. It is pluripolar because it lies in the pole set of $\varphi $, which is pluripolar by definition 5.47.2, applied with small balls in $\Omega $ as neighborhoods.
The subtraction $(s,t)\mapsto s-t$ is continuous from $[-\infty ,\infty )^2\setminus \{ (-\infty ,-\infty )\} $ to $[-\infty ,\infty ]$. At points where $s$ and $t$ are finite, this is the continuity of subtraction on $\mathbb R^2$. If $s=-\infty $ and $t$ is finite, then for every $M>0$ we have $s'-t'<-M$ whenever $t'>t-1$ and $s'<t-1-M$; this is continuity with the value $-\infty $. Symmetrically, if $s$ is finite and $t=-\infty $, then $s'-t'>M$ whenever $s'>s-1$ and $t'<s-1-M$. Since $z\mapsto (\varphi (z),\psi (z))$ is plurifinely continuous on $\Omega \setminus P$ with values in this domain, $\varphi -\psi $ is plurifinely continuous on $\Omega \setminus P$. Finally, $b$ is continuous for the Euclidean topology, hence for the plurifine topology, and addition is continuous from $[-\infty ,\infty ]\times \mathbb R$ to $[-\infty ,\infty ]$. $\square$
Definition 5.47.26.FF965EAEB1A3 Let $X$ be a complex manifold, let $W\subset X$ be a nonempty plurifine open set, let $Z\subset X$ be pluripolar, and let $f\colon W\setminus Z\to [-\infty ,\infty ]$. The quasi-supremum and the quasi-infimum of $f$ on $W$ are
where $N$ ranges over the pluripolar subsets of $X$ containing $Z$, and all suprema and infima are taken in $[-\infty ,\infty ]$.
The sets $W\setminus N$ in this definition are nonempty: by proposition 5.47.16(1), $W$ contains a Borel set of positive Lebesgue measure in some chart, whereas $N$ is Lebesgue null in every chart.
Corollary 5.47.27.D6E89A0A4867 Let $\Omega \subset \mathbb C^ n$ be open, let $\varphi ,\psi \in \mathrm{PSH}(\Omega )$, let $b$ be a continuous real function on $\Omega $, and let $f=\varphi -\psi +b$ on $\Omega \setminus P$, where $P=\{ \varphi =\psi =-\infty \} $. Let $Z\subset \Omega $ be a pluripolar set containing $P$, and let $W\subset \Omega $ be a nonempty plurifine open set. Then
In particular, the right-hand sides do not depend on the choice of $Z$.
Proof. The set $W'=W\setminus P$ is plurifine open, and $f$ is plurifinely continuous on $W'$, by proposition 5.47.25. Let $N$ be a pluripolar set containing $P$. We claim that $\sup _{W'\setminus N}f=\sup _{W'}f$. The inequality $\le $ holds because $W'\setminus N\subset W'$. Conversely, if $s\in \mathbb R$ and $s<\sup _{W'}f$, then $\{ z\in W':f(z)>s\} $ is a nonempty plurifine open set. It meets $\Omega \setminus N$, which is plurifine dense by proposition 5.47.16(2), and hence $\sup _{W'\setminus N}f>s$. This proves the claim, and the same argument with the sets $\{ f<s\} $ gives $\inf _{W'\setminus N}f=\inf _{W'}f$.
Since $W\setminus N=W'\setminus N$ whenever $N\supset P$, every pluripolar set $N\supset Z$ gives $\sup _{W\setminus N}f=\sup _{W\setminus P}f$; taking $N=Z$, we also get $\sup _{W\setminus Z}f=\sup _{W\setminus P}f$. Hence $\operatorname *{q-sup}_ Wf=\sup _{W\setminus Z}f=\sup _{W\setminus P}f$, and similarly $\operatorname *{q-inf}_ Wf=\inf _{W\setminus Z}f=\inf _{W\setminus P}f$. The common values do not involve $Z$. $\square$
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.