Pome

Lemma 5.18.152E0432C779A0

Lemma 5.18.15.2E0432C779A0 Assume that $X$ is compact. Let $\varphi \in \mathrm{QPSH}(X)$ be a potential with analytic singularities. Then for any $\epsilon >0$, we can find $k_0>0$ such that for each $k\geq k_0$, we have

35E0DBB664F7 5.18.16
\begin{equation} \mathcal{I}\left(k(1+\epsilon )\varphi \right)\subseteq \mathcal{I}_{\infty }(k\varphi ). \end{equation}

Proof. We shall prove a more precise local result. Take $x\in X$, take an open neighborhood $U\subseteq X$ of $x$, on which

\[ \varphi =c\log \left( |g_1|^2 +\cdots +|g_ N|^2\right)+\mathcal{O}(1), \]

where $c\in \mathbb {Q}_{>0}$ and $g_1,\ldots ,g_ N$ are holomorphic functions on $U$. Then we claim that for any $\lambda >0$, we have

D1A302A4CDD6 5.18.17
\begin{equation} \mathcal{I}(\lambda \varphi )_ x\subseteq \mathcal{I}_{\infty }\left( \left( \lambda -c^{-1}n \right)_+\varphi \right)_ x, \end{equation}

where for any $a\in \mathbb {R}$, $a_+$ means $a\lor 0$. Note that (5.18.16) is a straightforward consequence of (5.18.17). The global result follows easily from the local result by the compactness of $X$.

Fix a smooth volume form $\mathrm{d}V$ on $X$. Take $f\in \mathcal{I}(\lambda \varphi )$. By strong openness theorem 5.16.21, we can find $\epsilon >0$ so that $f\in \mathcal{I}((\lambda +\epsilon /c)\varphi )$. Therefore, we can find an open neighborhood $W\subseteq U$ of $x$ so that

\[ \int _ W |f|^2\left( |g_1|^2 +\cdots +|g_ N|^2\right)^{-c\lambda -\epsilon }\, \mathrm{d}V<\infty . \]

But it follows from the Briançon–Skoda division theorem ([Sko72], [SB74], [Theorem 11.17, Dem12]) that

\[ f_ x\in \left(g_{1,x},\ldots ,g_{N,x} \right)^\alpha , \]

where $\alpha =\left(\lfloor c \lambda \rfloor -n+1\right)_+$. Here $\left(g_{1,x},\ldots ,g_{N,x} \right)$ denotes the ideal in $\mathcal{O}_{X,x}$ generated by the germs of $g_1,\ldots ,g_ N$ at $x$. Note that $\alpha \geq (c\lambda -n)_+$.

It follows that on a neighborhood of $x$, we have

\[ \log |f|^2\leq \alpha \log \left( |g_1|^2 +\cdots +|g_ N|^2\right)+\mathcal{O}(1)\leq c^{-1}\alpha \varphi +\mathcal{O}(1). \]

Hence (5.18.17) follows. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.