Pome

5.43.6 Maps to a curve3110CB46064E

Let $p:X\to C$ be a surjective holomorphic map with connected fibers, where $X$ is a connected compact complex manifold of dimension $n\geq 1$ and $C$ is a connected compact Riemann surface. Critical fibers are allowed. Fix any smooth real $(1,1)$-form $\beta $ on $C$.

Proposition 5.43.7.47C6B39BA71A Pullback gives a bijection

\[ \mathrm{PSH}(C,\beta )\longrightarrow \mathrm{PSH}(X,p^*\beta ). \]

It preserves the supremum and the ordinary singularity order.

Proof. The critical set is a proper compact analytic subset of $X$. It has finitely many irreducible components, and $p$ is constant on each: its differential vanishes on the smooth locus of that component, and continuity extends the constant to the component. Thus the set $D\subset C$ of critical values is finite.

Let $U\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,p^*\beta )$. On a base coordinate disk choose a smooth $a$ with $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}a=\beta $. Over $C\setminus D$, the function $U+a\circ p$ restricts to a plurisubharmonic function, or the constant $-\infty $, on each compact connected fiber. The maximum principle makes it constant there. Local holomorphic sections then give a function $v$ with $U=v\circ p$ and $a+v$ subharmonic. This is the local argument of proposition 5.43.5; it uses compactness of the fibers, not compactness of the punctured total space.

The function $v$ is bounded above by $\sup _ XU$. The removable singularity theorem extends $a+v$ subharmonically across the finitely many punctures. The extensions glue, giving $v\in \mathrm{PSH}(C,\beta )$. Its pullback is $p^*\beta $-plurisubharmonic by lemma 5.43.2. It agrees with $U$ off the proper analytic set $p^{-1}(D)$, hence almost everywhere and everywhere by lemma 5.24.3.

Conversely pullback preserves the curvature inequality by the disk criterion. It is not identically $-\infty $, because $p$ is surjective. Surjectivity also proves uniqueness and preserves the supremum and every inequality $v\leq w+c$. $\square$

Lemma 5.43.8.11E6C3E4D36C Let $f:(\mathbb C^ m,0)\to (\mathbb C,0)$ be a nonconstant holomorphic germ, with $m\geq 1$, and let $e=\operatorname {ord}_0f$. For every quasi-subharmonic germ $v$ at zero,

\[ \nu (v\circ f,0)=e\nu (v,0). \]

Proof. A smooth correction of $v$ pulls back to a smooth function, so we may assume that $v$ is subharmonic. The Taylor expansion of $f$ gives $|f(z)|\leq M|z|^ e$ on a small ball. Choose a unit vector $\xi $ on which the leading homogeneous term is nonzero. Then

\[ f(\zeta \xi )=a\zeta ^ e+O(\zeta ^{e+1}),\qquad a\ne 0. \]

For all small $r$, the remainder has modulus at most $|a|r^ e/4$ on $|\zeta |=r$. If $|t|<|a|r^ e/4$, Rouché's theorem shows that $f(\zeta \xi )-t$ has $e$ zeros in $|\zeta |<r$. Consequently, with $c=|a|/4$,

\[ \{ |t|<cr^ e\} \subset f(B(0,r)) \subset \{ |t|<Mr^ e\} . \]

The suprema of $v$ on these three sets are ordered. Dividing by $\log r^2<0$, the two disk terms both tend to $e\nu (v,0)$ by the definition in section 5.34. The middle term therefore has the same limit, proving the formula. $\square$

Corollary 5.43.9.5B3D7BB20499 For $v,w\in \mathrm{QPSH}(C)$, the inclusions $\mathcal I(tv)\subseteq \mathcal I(tw)$ for every $t>0$ hold if and only if

\[ \mathcal I(t(v\circ p))\subseteq \mathcal I(t(w\circ p)) \quad \text{for every }t>0. \]

In particular pullback preserves and reflects all-weight multiplier-ideal equivalence.

Proof. On a smooth curve, local modifications are isomorphisms. By theorem 5.37.3, the base inclusions are therefore equivalent to $\nu (v,s)\geq \nu (w,s)$ for every $s\in C$. Let $\pi $ be any local modification of a neighborhood in $X$ with smooth source, and let $y$ be a point of its source. In a coordinate at $s=p(\pi (y))$, the germ $p\circ \pi -s$ is nonconstant. Indeed, a modification is an isomorphism on a dense open set, and a nonconstant holomorphic map cannot be constant on an open set. Its order $e_ y$ is positive and finite. The preceding lemma gives

\[ \nu (v\circ p\circ \pi ,y)=e_ y\nu (v,s),\qquad \nu (w\circ p\circ \pi ,y)=e_ y\nu (w,s). \]

The base inequalities thus imply all inequalities upstairs, and the same valuative theorem gives the ideal inclusions. Conversely the upstairs inclusions give the inequalities for the identity modification at any $x\in p^{-1}(s)$. Dividing by $\operatorname {ord}_ x(p-s)>0$ recovers the base inequalities. Apply this argument in both directions for equality. $\square$

Lemma 5.43.10.633794C1EFC2 If $v_ j,v\in \mathrm{PSH}(C,\beta )$ and $v_ j\to v$ in $L^1(C)$, then $v_ j\circ p\to v\circ p$ in $L^1(X)$ for every smooth positive volume form on $X$.

Proof. Put $M_ j=\sup _ Cv_ j$ and $M=\sup _ Cv$. Hartogs' lemma applied at moving maximum points gives $\limsup M_ j\leq M$. A subsequence with limiting suprema below $M$ would give $v$ below that limit almost everywhere, hence everywhere, a contradiction. Thus $M_ j\to M$.

By surjectivity, $(v_ j-M_ j)\circ p$ has supremum zero. Normalized compactness, theorem 5.25.2, makes these pullbacks precompact in $L^1(X)$. On every relatively compact product chart over $C\setminus D$, where $D$ is the finite set of critical values, Fubini's theorem and bounded smooth volume densities give local $L^1$ convergence to $(v-M)\circ p$. Every subsequential limit therefore equals this pullback off $p^{-1}(D)$, and hence almost everywhere, because that analytic set has smooth volume zero. All subsequential limits agree, so the entire normalized sequence converges. Adding $M_ j\to M$ proves the assertion. $\square$

Lemma 5.43.11.CE5106030996 A function $v\in \mathrm{QPSH}(C)$ has analytic singularities if and only if $v\circ p$ has analytic singularities.

Proof. Composing a local analytic presentation with $p$ proves the forward implication. The pulled-back generators are not all identically zero, since a nonconstant map to a curve is open.

Conversely fix $s\in C$ and $x\in p^{-1}(s)$. In coordinates, choose a complex line through $x$ on which $p-s$ has its finite order $e$ and is nonconstant, as in the Lelong lemma. On that line write

\[ (p-s)(\zeta )=h(\zeta )^ e, \]

where $h$ is a local biholomorphism fixing zero; take an analytic $e$th root of the nonvanishing factor of the germ. The restriction of $v\circ p$ to the line is not identically $-\infty $, since $v$ is finite almost everywhere and this map is open. By proposition 5.34.1, it has analytic singularities. In one variable its presentation is $r\log |\zeta |^2+O(1)$ with $r\in \mathbb Q_{\geq 0}$, obtained by taking the least order of its finitely many generators. Changing to $w=h(\zeta )$ gives

\[ v(s+w^ e)=r\log |w|^2+O(1). \]

Every sufficiently small $t$ has an $e$th root $w$, so $v(s+t)=(r/e)\log |t|^2+O(1)$. This is an analytic presentation on the base, including a bounded one when $r=0$. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.