The minimum principle can also show that a supremum is already upper semicontinuous. For a concave family of potentials, the regularized Legendre transform is a potential on a product. The minimum principle identifies its inverse transforms with the original family everywhere, and applying the one-variable duality once more identifies the regularization with the pointwise supremum. We first state this duality precisely, including its behavior at the endpoints; the general Legendre–Fenchel theorem is recalled in 21.3 Legendre duality and convex envelopes.
Lemma 5.41.5.742009E66DA3 Let $c\in \mathbb R$. Suppose $g:\mathbb R\to [-\infty ,0]$ is upper semicontinuous, concave and decreasing, finite somewhere, and equal to $-\infty $ on $(c,\infty )$. Then
\[ f(t)=\sup _{\tau <c}\bigl (g(\tau )+t\tau \bigr ),\qquad t>0, \]
is finite and convex, satisfies $f(t)\leq ct$, and obeys
\[ g(\tau )=\inf _{t>0}\bigl (f(t)-t\tau \bigr ),\qquad \lim _{t\downarrow 0}f(t)=\sup _{\tau <c}g(\tau ). \]
Conversely, every finite convex $f$ on $(0,\infty )$ with $f(t)\leq ct$ is recovered by the first formula from $g(\tau )=\inf _{t>0}(f(t)-t\tau )$, and satisfies the same endpoint identity. The formulas also hold for $g\equiv -\infty $, with $f\equiv -\infty $.
Proof.
Since $g$ is decreasing and finite somewhere, it is finite on a half-line $(-\infty ,\tau _1)$. Hence the defining supremum is finite for $t>0$: it is bounded above by $ct$ and below by any one of its finite terms. Concavity and upper semicontinuity give $g(c)=\lim _{\tau \uparrow c}g(\tau )$, so including $\tau =c$ does not change the supremum. The Legendre transform $t\mapsto \sup _\tau (g(\tau )+t\tau )$ of $-g$ is infinite for $t<0$. At $t=0$ it equals $m=\sup _{\tau <c}g(\tau )$, and the bounds
\[ g(\tau )+t\tau \leq f(t)\leq m+ct \]
show that $f(t)\to m$ as $t\downarrow 0$. The biconjugacy theorem for the closed convex function $-g$ therefore gives the inverse formula; the value at $t=0$ may be omitted without changing the infimum.
Conversely, start with $f$. At each $t>0$, choose the slope $p$ of a supporting line of $f$. The upper bound $f(s)\leq cs$ as $s\to \infty $ forces $p\leq c$. If $p<c$, the supporting line gives $g(p)=f(t)-tp$, so the first formula recovers $f(t)$. If $p=c$, then $f(s)-cs$ is constant for $s\geq t$, because this function is convex and bounded above, hence decreasing, while its supporting line at $t$ is horizontal. Consequently, for every $\tau <c$,
\[ f(t)-ct\leq g(\tau )\leq f(t)-t\tau . \]
and letting $\tau \uparrow c$ again recovers $f(t)$. In particular, $g$ is finite somewhere. As an infimum of affine functions with slopes $-s<0$, it is upper semicontinuous, concave and decreasing. Letting $s\downarrow 0$ in the bound $f(s)-s\tau \leq s(c-\tau )$ gives $g\leq 0$, and letting $s\to \infty $ gives $g=-\infty $ for $\tau >c$. The endpoint identity now follows from the first part. The case of functions identically equal to $-\infty $ follows directly from the formulas.
$\square$
Fix $c\in \mathbb R$, and let $\Gamma _\tau \in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$ for $\tau <c$ be functions with $\Gamma _\tau \leq 0$ such that $\tau \mapsto \Gamma _\tau (x)$ is concave and decreasing for every $x$. Extend the family to $\tau =c$ by the decreasing limit $\Gamma _ c=\lim _{\tau \uparrow c}\Gamma _\tau $, and by $\Gamma _\tau \equiv -\infty $ for $\tau >c$. Define the forward transform of the family by
0CEA269E6373
5.41.6
\begin{equation} U_ t(x)=\sup _{\tau <c}\bigl (\Gamma _\tau (x)+t\tau \bigr ), \qquad t>0. \end{equation}
For a family $(u_ t)_{t>0}$, the inverse transform is
932E0DC4EFDD
5.41.7
\begin{equation} \widehat u_\tau (x)=\inf _{t>0}\bigl (u_ t(x)-t\tau \bigr ). \end{equation}
Lemma 5.41.8.FAE98D3A3F69 At each $x$, the extended function $\tau \mapsto \Gamma _\tau (x)$ is upper semicontinuous and concave, or identically $-\infty $. Its forward transform satisfies
\[ \Gamma _\tau (x)=\inf _{t>0}\bigl (U_ t(x)-t\tau \bigr ) \qquad (\tau \in \mathbb R). \]
Proof.
Fix $\tau <c$ and let $\tau _ j\uparrow \tau $. The decreasing limit of the functions $\Gamma _{\tau _ j}$ dominates $\Gamma _\tau $, so it belongs to $\mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$. Choose $r\in (\tau ,c)$. Outside the pole set of $\Gamma _ r$, the concave function $s\mapsto \Gamma _ s(x)$ is finite near $\tau $ and hence continuous there. Thus the decreasing limit equals $\Gamma _\tau $ almost everywhere, and hence everywhere by lemma 5.24.3. This proves left continuity at every $\tau <c$; at $c$ it holds by definition. Since the function is decreasing, left continuity gives upper semicontinuity, also where the value is $-\infty $, and concavity survives the extension. The inverse formula is lemma 5.41.5 at each $x$.
$\square$
Theorem 5.41.9.5EA08D4F62B2 For the preceding family $(\Gamma _\tau )_{\tau <c}$, the pointwise supremum in (5.41.6) is already upper semicontinuous on $X\times (0,\infty )$. Its complexification $U(x,z)=U_{\operatorname{Re}z}(x)$ is quasi-plurisubharmonic on $X\times \{ \operatorname{Re}z>0\} $ and satisfies $\pi ^*\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}U\geq 0$, where $\pi :X\times \{ \operatorname{Re}z>0\} \to X$ is the projection. Each slice belongs to $\mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$.
Proof.
Each term $(x,z)\mapsto \Gamma _\tau (x)+\tau \operatorname{Re}z$ of the supremum satisfies the current inequality on the product, since $\operatorname{Re}z$ is pluriharmonic. The bound $\Gamma _\tau \leq 0$ gives $U_ t\leq ct$, while any fixed $\tau _0<c$ gives the minorant $\Gamma _{\tau _0}+t\tau _0$. By the local upper-envelope theorem, as in section 5.40, the upper semicontinuous regularization $V$ of $U$ on the product is quasi-plurisubharmonic, satisfies $\pi ^*\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}V\geq 0$, and agrees with $U$ almost everywhere. It does not depend on $\operatorname {Im}z$ and satisfies $V_ t\leq ct$. The pointwise supremum $U$ is measurable, since by the left continuity in lemma 5.41.8 the parameters may be restricted to rational numbers.
By Fubini's theorem, there is a set $Z\subset X$ of zero smooth volume, containing the pole set of $\Gamma _{\tau _0}$, such that $U_ t(x)=V_ t(x)$ for almost every $t>0$ whenever $x\notin Z$. For such $x$, both sides are finite convex functions of $t$, by lemma 5.41.5, lemma 5.41.1, so by continuity the equality holds for every $t>0$.
For each $\tau <c$, proposition 5.41.3 gives
\[ \chi _\tau =\inf _{t>0}(V_ t-t\tau ) \in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )\cup \{ -\infty \} . \]
Off $Z$ it equals $\Gamma _\tau $ by lemma 5.41.8. In particular, $\chi _\tau $ is not identically $-\infty $, and lemma 5.24.3 gives $\chi _\tau =\Gamma _\tau $ everywhere. At each $x$, the convex function $t\mapsto V_ t(x)$ can be recovered from these inverse transforms by lemma 5.41.5, also when it is identically $-\infty $. We obtain
\[ V_ t(x)=\sup _{\tau <c}\bigl (\chi _\tau (x)+t\tau \bigr )=U_ t(x). \]
Finally, the minorant $\Gamma _{\tau _0}+t\tau _0$ shows that no slice $U_ t$ is identically $-\infty $, so every slice belongs to $\mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta )$.
$\square$
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.