Pome

Lemma 5.43.236AA2493173A9

Lemma 5.43.23.6AA2493173A9 For quasi-plurisubharmonic $a,b$ on $X$,

\[ a\preceq _{\mathcal I}b \quad \Longleftrightarrow \quad a\circ \pi \preceq _{\mathcal I}b\circ \pi . \]

The assertion is local on $X$ and also holds for a proper bimeromorphic map between noncompact smooth complex manifolds.

Proof. The reverse implication follows at every positive weight from the sheaf identity in lemma 5.43.22: tensor the inclusion of ideals on $Y$ with $R_\pi $ and apply the left-exact direct image functor. The proof of that sheaf identity is local on the target, since properness makes each fiber compact and gives the required finite cover by integrability charts; compactness of the manifolds themselves is not needed.

For the forward implication, fix a coordinate neighborhood $W\subset Y$, a local modification $\sigma :Z\to W$ with smooth source, and a prime divisor $E$ on $Z$. After shrinking $W$ around the point under consideration, its image is contained in a coordinate neighborhood $U\subset X$. Put $F=\pi \circ \sigma $ and

\[ A_ F(E)=1+\operatorname {ord}_ E\operatorname {Jac}F. \]

The map $F$ is holomorphic, and it is injective and biholomorphic off a proper analytic subset; it need not be a proper modification of $U$.

Let $m$ be a positive integer, and let $\nu _ E$ and $\operatorname {ord}_ E$ be the generic Lelong number and the generic vanishing order along $E$, as in section 5.38. The proof of lemma 5.38.9 applies to the map $F$ on relatively compact coordinate patches and gives

\[ \max \left\{ \nu _ E(a\circ F)-\frac{A_ F(E)}m,0\right\} \leq \frac1m\operatorname {ord}_ E\bigl (\mathcal I(ma)\mathcal O_ Z\bigr ) \leq \nu _ E(a\circ F). \]

In more detail, the upper inequality follows by pulling back the local Bergman lower bound on $U$. For the lower one, a germ $f\in \mathcal I(ma)$ pulls back to a coefficient $(f\circ F)\operatorname {Jac}F$ that is square integrable against $\mathrm e^{-ma\circ F}$, because on a relatively compact patch of $Z$ the change-of-variables integral is bounded by the integral over the image of the patch. Generic divisorial removal and the one-variable integral then give

\[ \operatorname {ord}_ E(f\circ F)+A_ F(E)>m\nu _ E(a\circ F). \]

This estimate only uses the injectivity of $F$ off the exceptional set and the compactness of the patch, not properness of $F$ over $U$. The same estimates hold for $b$.

The hypothesis gives $\mathcal I(ma)\subseteq \mathcal I(mb)$ for every $m>0$, so the orders of the pulled-back ideals satisfy the reverse inequality. Letting $m\to \infty $ in the two estimates proves

\[ \nu _ E(a\circ F)\geq \nu _ E(b\circ F). \]

This holds for every local divisor over $Y$. Blowing up a point on the source of any local modification recovers the Lelong number at that point as a generic Lelong number along the exceptional divisor; in dimension one the point already is a divisor. The local criterion in theorem 5.37.3 now gives $a\circ \pi \preceq _{\mathcal I}b\circ \pi $. No extension of $\sigma $ beyond its local domain was used. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.