5.36.4 Smooth remainders after resolution70049B9396E7
For arguments on a modification, the bounded remainder in an analytic presentation is sometimes insufficient. The following version of regularization gives a smooth remainder after resolution.
Theorem 5.36.5(Demailly regularization).88038BD901A0 Let $\alpha $ be a smooth real $(1,1)$-form and let $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\alpha )$. There are numbers $\delta _ j\downarrow 0$ and functions $\widetilde u_ j\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\alpha +\delta _ j\omega )$ decreasing to $u$ with the following properties. Each $\widetilde u_ j$ is smooth outside an analytic pole set, and there is a modification $\pi _ j:Y_ j\to X$, obtained by a finite sequence of blowups with smooth centers, such that locally on $Y_ j$
Here the $s_\ell $ are local holomorphic defining functions of divisors, the $a_\ell >0$ are real numbers, and $b$ is a smooth real function. The divisors may be taken to have simple normal crossings.
This classical theorem is applied to the closed current $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u$ with the smooth lower bound $-\alpha $; see section 25.3 for its source. The lower bound need not be closed, and $X$ need not be Kähler. What matters here is the smooth remainder $b$ after resolution; an analytic type, whose remainder is merely bounded, would not suffice. The sequence $(\widetilde u_ j)$ need not be the multiplier-ideal sequence of theorem 5.36.1, and we do not claim that the conclusions of the two theorems hold for one and the same sequence. If $\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u\geq \varepsilon \omega $ for some $\varepsilon >0$, applying the theorem with $\alpha =\theta -\varepsilon \omega $ and discarding the terms with $\delta _ j\geq \varepsilon $ gives approximants with $\theta +\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\widetilde u_ j\geq (\varepsilon -\delta _ j)\omega >0$; thus strict positivity is preserved.
Cite this page
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.