Lemma 5.37.18.750629715507 For a subharmonic function $u$ on $\Omega $ and $x\in \Omega $,
B6502E786DEE
5.37.19
These ideals form a locally principal ideal sheaf.
A5A50BF6024BIn this subsection, $\Omega \subset \mathbb C$ is a pseudoconvex domain with Euclidean area $\mathrm{d}V$, and we use the weighted norms and spaces of global sections of 5.37.9. In one variable, every multiplier ideal is determined by vanishing orders at points. This allows us to combine the weights into a single one before applying the one-weight estimate, and leads to a better constant than the product bound.
Lemma 5.37.18.750629715507 For a subharmonic function $u$ on $\Omega $ and $x\in \Omega $,
B6502E786DEE
5.37.19
These ideals form a locally principal ideal sheaf.
Proof. With the normalization of $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}$ fixed in the conventions, $\mu =\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u$ is a positive Radon measure and $a=\mu (\{ x\} )=\nu (u,x)$. After removal of this atom, the distribution $u-a\log |z-x|^2$ has positive complex Hessian, so it has a subharmonic representative $v$, and $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v$ has no atom at $x$. Since subharmonic functions that agree almost everywhere agree everywhere,
We claim that, for each $t>0$, the function $\mathrm e^{-tv}$ is integrable on some neighborhood of $x$. Indeed, since $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v$ has no atom at $x$, there is a disk $D=D(x,R)\Subset \Omega $ with $M=(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v)(D)<1/t$. On $D$ write
where $h$ is harmonic: the integral is locally integrable by Fubini's theorem and has complex Hessian $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v$ on $D$, so it differs from $v$ by a harmonic distribution. If $M=0$, the claim follows from harmonicity. For $M>0$, Jensen's inequality for the probability measure $(\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v)/M$ gives
Since $tM<1$, the integral of $|z-y|^{-2tM}$ over $z\in D(x,R/2)$ is bounded uniformly in $y\in D$. The harmonic function $h$ is bounded below on this smaller disk, so Tonelli's theorem proves the claim. (Truncating the logarithmic kernel justifies Jensen's inequality at its poles.)
A nonzero holomorphic germ of order $k$ at $x$ is a unit times $(z-x)^ k$. Since $v$ is locally bounded above, weighted integrability requires $k+1>a$; equality is excluded by the logarithmic divergence of the radial integral. Conversely, if $k+1>a$, choose $b>1$ such that $b(a-k)<1$. Then $|z-x|^{2k-2a}$ belongs locally to $L^ b$, and $\mathrm e^{-v}$ belongs locally to $L^{b/(b-1)}$ by the claim, so Hölder's inequality proves integrability. Thus the germ belongs to $\mathcal I(u)_ x$ exactly when $k\geq \lfloor a\rfloor $.
The points $y$ with $\nu (u,y)\geq 1$ form a locally finite set, since each of them carries an atom of mass at least one of the locally finite measure $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u$. Near any point, therefore, the ideal sheaf is generated by a single power of a coordinate, which proves the last assertion. $\square$
The distance condition below involves a sum of spaces of global sections. In one variable, this sum coincides with the space of global sections of the sum of the ideal sheaves.
Lemma 5.37.20.9AA5F4F533CD If $u_1,\ldots ,u_ r$ are subharmonic functions on $\Omega $, then
594319E5AC8F
5.37.21
Proof. For $r=1$ there is nothing to prove, so let $r\geq 2$. Put $J_ i=\mathcal I(u_ i)$ and $J=\sum _ iJ_ i$. By lemma 5.37.18, these sheaves are locally free of rank one. At each point, the order of $J$ is the smallest of the orders of the $J_ i$, and a local generator of an ideal $J_ i$ attaining this order also generates $J$. Consequently the sum map $\bigoplus _ iJ_ i\to J$ is locally split, and its kernel $E$ is a holomorphic vector bundle of rank $r-1$.
Fix $f\in \Gamma (\Omega ,J)$. Gluing local holomorphic lifts of $f$ with a smooth partition of unity gives a smooth section $s$ of $\bigoplus _ iJ_ i$ whose image is $f$. Since $f$ is holomorphic, $\beta =\bar\partial s$ is an $E$-valued $(0,1)$-form. It suffices to solve $\bar\partial v=\beta $ for a section $v$ of $E$, for then $s-v$ is a holomorphic lift of $f$.
We solve this equation using a bundle metric of positive curvature. Choose a smooth strictly subharmonic exhaustion function $\rho \geq 1$ of $\Omega $. The Kähler metric
is complete: it dominates $2\mathrm i\partial \rho \wedge \bar\partial \rho $, so $\rho $ has bounded gradient with respect to it, and therefore every curve leaving all compact subsets has infinite length.
Equip $E$ with a smooth Hermitian metric $h$. Choose a smooth increasing convex function $\chi $ on $[1,+\infty )$ so that the metric $h_\chi =h\mathrm e^{-\chi (\rho )}$ has
These two requirements can be imposed successively on the compact sublevel sets of $\rho $: increase $\chi '$ so that $\chi '(\rho )$ times the positive Hessian of $\rho $ dominates the negative part of the curvature, and increase $\chi $ so that the integral over each shell $\{ m\leq \rho <m+1\} $ is at most $2^{-m}$. Increasing the slopes preserves the inequalities already achieved.
Use the global frame $\mathrm{d}z$ of the canonical bundle $K_\Omega $ to identify $E$-valued $(0,q)$-forms with $(E\otimes K_\Omega ^{-1})$-valued $(1,q)$-forms, and give $K_\Omega ^{-1}$ its flat coordinate metric. Its curvature is zero, and $\omega _*$ dominates the Euclidean metric, so the identified form $\beta $ remains $L^2$. The Bochner–Kodaira inequality for compactly supported forms $w$ of type $(1,1)$ gives
Here we used that there are no $(1,2)$-forms. By completeness, cutoffs and smoothing extend this inequality to the domain of the adjoint. Since $\beta $ is $L^2$, the Cauchy–Schwarz inequality bounds the functional $w\mapsto \langle w,\beta \rangle $ by $\| \beta \| \| \bar\partial ^*w\| $, and the Riesz representation theorem gives a distributional solution $v$ of $\bar\partial v=\beta $. Thus $s-v$ is distributionally holomorphic, hence holomorphic in every bundle chart, and it is the required global lift. No global weighted norm condition is imposed on its components. $\square$
Theorem 5.37.22.E767909834AD Let $\psi $ and $\phi _1,\ldots ,\phi _ r$ be subharmonic functions on $\Omega $, with $r\geq 1$ and $\phi _ i<0$, and choose $p_ i>1$. For holomorphic $f$ with $I=\| f\| _{\psi +\sum _ i\phi _ i}^2<+\infty $, define
Then
For every fixed choice of the exponents, this constant is optimal over the stated class of data. If $s\geq 1$, the function $g=0$ is admissible.
Proof. Put $J_ i=\mathcal I(p_ i\phi _ i+\psi )$ and $J=\sum _ iJ_ i$. At a point $x$, write $A=\nu (\psi ,x)$ and $B_ i=\nu (\phi _ i,x)$. By lemma 5.37.18, the order of $J_ x$ is $\min _ i\lfloor A+p_ iB_ i\rfloor $.
Suppose first that $s<1$, and put $P=1/s>1$. The numbers $P/p_ i$ sum to one, so
Taking integer parts and using lemma 5.37.18 gives $\mathcal I(P\sum _ i\phi _ i+\psi )\subseteq J$. By lemma 5.37.20, every global section of this smaller ideal sheaf lies in $\sum _ i\Gamma (\Omega ,J_ i)$, so every remainder admissible for the one-weight problem is admissible for $c$. Proposition 5.37.14 with $\phi =\sum _ i\phi _ i$ and $p=P$ therefore gives $c\leq (1-1/P)I=(1-s)I$.
Now let $s\geq 1$. Since $I<+\infty $, we have $f\in \Gamma (\Omega ,\mathcal I(\psi +\sum _ i\phi _ i))$. If $f\equiv 0$ there is nothing to prove; otherwise let $k$ be its order at $x$. Then $k+1>A+\sum _ iB_ i$. If its germ did not belong to $J_ x$, we would have $k+1\leq A+p_ iB_ i$ for every $i$. With $L=k+1-A>0$, this would give $\sum _ iB_ i\geq sL\geq L$, a contradiction. Hence $f\in \Gamma (\Omega ,J)$, and lemma 5.37.20 shows that $g=0$ is admissible.
For sharpness when $s<1$, take the unit disk, $\psi =0$, $f=1$, and $\phi _ i=p_ i^{-1}\log |z|^2$. Then $J_ i=(z)$ for all $i$, so an admissible $g$ has $g(0)=1$. Orthogonality of the monomials on the disk gives $c=\pi $, attained by $g=1$, whereas $I=\pi /(1-s)$. If $s\geq 1$, keep these weights and take $f=z^ q$ with an integer $q\geq 0$ satisfying $q+1>s$. Then $I=\pi /(q+1-s)>0$ and $c=0$, so the constant $0$ cannot be replaced by a negative number. $\square$
Consequently, for $r\geq 2$ the product constant of theorem 5.37.15 is not optimal on plane domains. The argument above relies on all local ideals being principal; it does not determine the optimal constant when $n\geq 2$ and $r>n$.
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.