Proposition 12.6.22.7294934ED49C For $A>0$ on any such compact complex Lie-group quotient,
18897CCC762F
12.6.23
The invariant probability $\mu _0$ attains this maximum. In particular the quotient has the bounded mass property.
D70657252686In dimension three, an invariant positive background has a nonnegative complex Hessian. Together with the mass identities for Gauduchon backgrounds, this determines its upper Monge–Ampère mass and shows that the singular semipositive coefficient limits have zero top mass. On the Iwasawa quotient, the same calculation identifies exactly which smooth reference probabilities keep the determinant formula for the volume.
We keep the invariant coframe, $h_0$, $H$ and $\theta _ A$ of subsection 12.6.4, and now assume $n=3$. Write $\mu _0=h_0^3/H$ to distinguish this invariant probability from other reference measures, and let $\mathscr M$ be the set of smooth strictly positive probability forms on $X$. Recall that $v_+$ denotes the upper Monge–Ampère mass of definition 13.14.14.
Proposition 12.6.22.7294934ED49C For $A>0$ on any such compact complex Lie-group quotient,
18897CCC762F
12.6.23
The invariant probability $\mu _0$ attains this maximum. In particular the quotient has the bounded mass property.
Proof. Since the forms $\mathrm d\alpha _ j$ are holomorphic, we have
2DDABE7168CA
12.6.24
Indeed $\bar\partial (\alpha _ j\wedge \bar\alpha _ k) =-\alpha _ j\wedge \mathrm d\bar\alpha _ k$, and applying $\partial $ and multiplying by $(\mathrm i/(2\pi ))^2$ gives the identity in (12.6.24). Diagonalizing the positive coefficient matrix expresses the result as a sum of nonnegative multiples of $\beta \wedge \bar\beta $ for invariant $(2,0)$-forms $\beta $. In dimension three these are nonnegative $(2,2)$-forms: the wedge product with $\mathrm i\xi \wedge \bar\xi $, for a $(1,0)$-form $\xi $, has the squared modulus of $\xi \wedge \beta $ as coefficient.
By proposition 12.6.5, $\theta _ A$ is balanced, hence Gauduchon. The maximum case of theorem 12.16.3 therefore gives $v_+(\theta _ A)=\int _ X\theta _ A^3=H\det A$. The supremum of $\mathcal V_\nu (\theta _ A)$ over $\nu \in \mathscr M$ equals this upper mass by theorem 12.15.4, and (12.6.6) shows that it is attained at $\mu _0$. Finally, proposition 13.14.15 makes the finiteness of the upper mass a property of the manifold. $\square$
Corollary 12.6.25.9BB432CC1FE6 If $A\geq 0$ is singular, then every bounded $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta _ A)$ satisfies
For every $u\in \mathrm{PSH}(X,\theta _ A)$, bounded or not, the non-pluripolar top power of $\theta _ A+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u$ is also zero. Thus the nonzero semipositive boundary forms $\theta _ A$ of proposition 12.6.5 have zero non-pluripolar top mass.
Proof. For $\varepsilon >0$, the same bounded $u$ is $\theta _{A+\varepsilon I}$-plurisubharmonic, so the preceding proposition bounds its mass by $H\det (A+\varepsilon I)$, which tends to zero with $\varepsilon $. By the multilinear construction of bounded products in proposition 5.28.2,
is a polynomial in $\varepsilon $ whose coefficients are mixed products of finite mass. Its total mass therefore converges to $\int _ X(\theta _ A+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u)^3$ as $\varepsilon \downarrow 0$, so this mass is zero, and positivity makes the measure zero.
For unbounded $u$, we subtract a constant so that $u\leq 0$. Since $\theta _ A\geq 0$, the truncations $u_ k=\max (u,-k)$ are bounded and $\theta _ A$-plurisubharmonic, so their top products vanish by the bounded case. Restricting them to $\{ u>-k\} $ and passing to the limit that defines the non-pluripolar product gives zero as well. $\square$
We now specialize to the Iwasawa quotient of example 12.6.18. Put
This is a holomorphic submersion with connected elliptic fibers, and the coordinate description of the fundamental cube gives $p_*\mu _0=\mu _ B$, where $\mu _ B$ is the Haar probability on $B$. A smooth probability is called fiber invariant if it has the form
Thus a smooth probability is fiber invariant when its density relative to $\mu _0$ is constant along the elliptic fibers of $p$; no invariance in the base directions is required.
Theorem 12.6.26.7AA419EEDABE For every $A>0$ and fiber-invariant $\mu _ f$,
3E1F104EFFA9
12.6.27
Its unique minimizing Gauduchon metric normalized by $D_{\mu _ f}=1$ is
98DEB3AF443E
12.6.28
where $v_{A,f}$ is the solution of the Monge–Ampère equation (12.6.29) on the torus $B$, with a closed background, constructed in the proof. Conversely, for a fixed $A>0$, the probabilities $\nu \in \mathscr M$ maximizing $\mathcal V_\nu (\theta _ A)$ are exactly the fiber-invariant ones.
For each fixed real linear $W\subset \operatorname {Herm}(3)$ containing a positive matrix, the Hessian metric for $\mu _ f$ is
Its unit-volume hypersurface $S_ W=\{ A\in W:A>0,\ H\det A=1\} $ is complete and proper, and the Cauchy criterion and the distance bounds of theorem 12.6.12 hold with $n=3$.
Proof. The map $p$ is well defined because multiplication by lattice elements adds Gaussian integers to the first two coordinates. It is a submersion, and fixing representatives of those coordinates identifies each fiber with the central quotient $E$. Integrating first in the third coordinate over the fundamental cube proves the pushforward identity.
The closed equation on the base. Write the positive Hermitian matrix in block form and take its Schur complement:
On $B$, let
We apply theorem 14.2.1 to this closed background with the density $Q_ Bf\mu _ B$. Since $\omega _ S$ is closed and the density has total mass $Q_ B$, Stokes' theorem forces the constant in the equation to be one. We obtain a smooth real $v=v_{A,f}$, unique up to an additive constant, such that
8859AB23548E
12.6.29
If $K$ is the coefficient matrix of $\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}v$ in the base coframe, this says $\det (S+K)=(\det S)f$. The form
has coefficient matrix $\left(\begin{smallmatrix}C+K& b\\ b^*& a\end{smallmatrix}\right)$ in the invariant coframe. Since $a>0$ and the Schur complement $S+K$ is positive, $\Omega >0$; its determinant is $a\det (S+K)=(\det A)(f\circ p)$. Consequently $\Omega ^3=(H\det A)\mu _ f$.
This solution form is also balanced. Put $\beta =\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}(p^*v)$, which is closed and uses only $\alpha _1,\alpha _2$ and their conjugates. Since $\mathrm d\alpha _3=-\alpha _1\wedge \alpha _2$, every term of $\partial \theta _ A$ contains $\alpha _1\wedge \alpha _2$, and every conjugate term contains $\bar\alpha _1\wedge \bar\alpha _2$. Thus $\mathrm d\theta _ A\wedge \beta =0$. Together with $\mathrm d\theta _ A^2=0$, this proves
Theorem 12.2.3 now gives (12.6.27). Its characterization of the minimizers, the balancedness of $\Omega $ and the homogeneity of degree two of $D_{\mu _ f}$ give the unique normalized minimizer (12.6.28).
All maximizing densities. Let $Z_3=\partial /\partial z_3$ be dual to $\alpha _3$, and set $\tau _ j=(\mathrm i/(2\pi ))\alpha _ j\wedge \bar\alpha _ j$. Directly from (12.6.24),
Since $\theta _ A$ is Gauduchon, the identity (12.16.4) therefore becomes, for every smooth real $u$,
3861E23FD396
12.6.30
Here $\mathrm du\wedge \mathrm d^{\mathrm c}u=(\mathrm i/(2\pi ))\partial u\wedge \bar\partial u$, and wedging with $\tau _1\wedge \tau _2$ selects its coefficient on $\alpha _3\wedge \bar\alpha _3$; this also accounts for the factor $1/2$.
For an arbitrary $\nu \in \mathscr M$, let $u_\nu $ be the smooth solution of the equation for $\theta _ A$ and $\nu $. Its mass equals $\mathcal V_\nu (\theta _ A)$ by theorem 12.2.3. By (12.6.30), this mass equals $H\det A$ exactly when $Z_3u_\nu =0$. As $u_\nu $ is real, its derivatives in both real directions of each elliptic fiber then vanish, and connectedness of the fibers gives $u_\nu =p^*v$ for a smooth $v$ on $B$. The density of $(\theta _ A+\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}u_\nu )^3$ relative to $\mu _0$ is then a function on $B$, so the equation makes $\nu $ fiber invariant. The converse was proved by the construction on the base.
Completion in the background parameters. For fixed $f$, formula (12.6.27) holds on the entire cone of positive matrices, and differentiating the logarithm of its cube root twice gives the stated Hessian metric. Since this is the same metric as in theorem 12.6.12, the matrix-path and coefficient-limit arguments of that proof apply unchanged on each fixed $W$. They give the distance bounds, completeness, properness and the Cauchy criterion; they do not use that the minimizing forms have constant coefficients. $\square$
For the minimizing metrics $\gamma _{A,f}$, the pointwise estimate (12.6.15) is replaced by an estimate for coefficient means. For a form $\eta $ whose coefficient matrix in the invariant coframe is $(\eta _{jk})$, write $\overline\eta $ for the matrix of means $\int _ X\eta _{jk}\, \mu _0$. The mean-zero identity (12.6.8) gives
Thus on $S_ W$ the distance bounds control these means, and along a normalized sequence whose coefficients converge to a nonzero singular semipositive matrix the largest eigenvalue of the means diverges. The corresponding minimizing metrics then cannot be bounded above by a fixed multiple of $h_0$. For $f\ne 1$, however, we do not obtain the pointwise bound (12.6.15) for the nonconstant forms $\gamma _{A,f}$.
Reference densities that vary along the fibers give a strictly smaller volume. Choose a smooth real $\chi $ supported in a coordinate ball with $Z_3\chi \not\equiv 0$, and let $t\ne 0$ be sufficiently small that $\theta _ A+t\mathrm{dd}^{\mathrm{c}}\chi >0$. Put
Then $t\chi $ solves the equation for $\theta _ A$ and $\nu _ t$ with constant $M(t)$, so theorem 12.2.3 and (12.6.30) give
Here $\nu _ t$ is constructed from the fixed background $\theta _ A$. The example therefore shows that the volume depends on the reference measure, but it does not determine the Hessian completion for a fixed density that varies along the fibers.
Comments
Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.