Pome

Proposition 5.35.1DBEB8E0E0318

Proposition 5.35.1.DBEB8E0E0318 There are constants $C_1,C_2$ independent of $m$ such that, for $B(x,r)\Subset \Omega $,

BFDE2F85F930 5.35.2
\begin{equation} \psi (x)-\frac{C_1}{m} \leq \beta _ m(x) \leq \sup _{B(x,r)}\psi +\frac1m\log \frac{C_2}{r^{2n}}. \end{equation}

Consequently $\beta _ m\to \psi $ pointwise and in $L^1_{\mathrm{loc}}$, and

F9AE1A865ACD 5.35.3
\begin{equation} \max \{ \nu (\psi ,x)-n/m,0\} \leq \nu (\beta _ m,x)\leq \nu (\psi ,x). \end{equation}

Proof. For $\| f\| _ m\leq 1$, the submean inequality gives

\[ |f(x)|^2 \leq C_2r^{-2n}\int _{B(x,r)}|f|^2\, \mathrm{d}\lambda \leq C_2r^{-2n}\mathrm{e}^{m\sup _{B(x,r)}\psi }. \]

Taking the supremum over the unit ball of $\mathcal H_ m$ and then the logarithm proves the upper bound.

For the lower bound, suppose that $\psi (x)>-\infty $. The local Ohsawa–Takegoshi point-extension theorem gives a holomorphic $f$ with $f(x)=1$ and

\[ \int _\Omega |f|^2\mathrm{e}^{-m\psi }\, \mathrm{d}\lambda \leq C \mathrm{e}^{-m\psi (x)}, \]

where the constant is independent of the plurisubharmonic weight and of $m$. After normalizing $f$ in $\mathcal H_ m$, we see that the squared norm of point evaluation is at least $C^{-1}\mathrm{e}^{m\psi (x)}$, which proves the lower bound. At a pole of $\psi $ the lower bound holds trivially.

Choosing $r=1/m$ in the upper bound and using upper semicontinuity of $\psi $ proves pointwise convergence. On a fixed relatively compact set, the same estimates bound $\beta _ m$ above by a constant and below by $\psi -C_1/m$. Since $\psi $ is locally integrable, dominated convergence also gives convergence in $L^1_{\mathrm{loc}}$.

For the Lelong estimate, take suprema over $B(x,r)$ in the two inequalities, bounding the right-hand side of the upper one by a supremum over $B(x,2r)$. Divide by $\log r^2<0$ and let $r\downarrow 0$. After the division, the term $-(2n/m)\log r$ contributes $-n/m$, while the constant terms disappear. This proves the two inequalities in (5.35.3); since Lelong numbers are nonnegative, the lower bound may be replaced by its maximum with zero. $\square$

Cite this page

Comments

Corrections, questions, and mathematical discussion are welcome. Sign in with GitHub to comment. Comments are public.